We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 197

Federal Circuit Reverses Finding Of No Violation of Section 337 And Remands In One-E-Way Appeal (2016-2105)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • June 21 2017

On June 12, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its precedential opinion in One-E-Way, Inc. v. ITC (2016-2105). This was


One-E-Way, Inc. v. International Trade Commission
  • Sughrue Mion PLLC
  • USA
  • June 12 2017

In One-E-Way v. ITC, the Federal Circuit reversed the ITC's determination that the claim language "virtually free from interference" is indefinite


ITC Issues Opinion Vacating Summary Determination In Certain Access Control Systems (337-TA-1016)
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • May 10 2017

On May 5, 2017, the International Trade Commission ("Commission") issued its opinion vacating the Initial Determination ("ID") granting a motion of


Design Patent Law Year In Review - 2016
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA, China, European Union, Global
  • February 27 2017

Perhaps the biggest design patent law story of 2016 was the United States Supreme Court opinion in Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Apple Inc. In this


Design Patents Remain a Valuable Part of a Patent Portfolio after Samsung v. Apple
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • February 2 2017

On December 6, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long awaited opinion addressing the issue of whether design patent owners were always entitled


Patent Damages Year In Review
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • February 2 2017

The past year saw significant changes in the world of patent damages, as the US Supreme Court decided two cases addressing patent damages issues in


The Uncertain Scope of IPR Estoppel
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • January 31 2017

Nearly four years after the AIA became effective, the estoppel provisions of 35 U.S.C. 325 are only now being explored by the Courts in any detail


Original Suprema panel affirms Commission on remand from en banc court
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • October 2 2015

On September 14, 2015, the original three-judge panel of the Federal Circuit in Suprema, Inc. v. ITC, Appeal No. 2012-1170, issued a nonprecedential


Federal Circuit affirms ITC's limits on the use of litigation costs to establish domestic industry
  • White & Case LLP
  • USA
  • October 19 2011

In the United States of America, a patent owner can enforce his patent rights in federal district courts andor the International Trade Commission (“ITC”).


Federal Circuit affirms ITC's determination that litigation generally cannot be used to establish a domestic industry
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 10 2011

The Federal Circuit has established that litigation activities cannot generally be used to satisfy the requirement in a Section 337 case before the International Trade Commission that the complainant demonstrate a domestic industry has been established.