We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 194

Federal Circuit patent bulletin: Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.
  • Wiley Rein LLP
  • USA
  • April 28 2014

On April 25, 2014, in Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Rader, Prost, Reyna) affirmed-in-part


Compliance with wireless standard does not equal inducement
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • October 31 2008

In an appeal arising out of an investigation before the International Trade Commission (ITC), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld a decision that the respondent did not induce infringement of petitioner’s patent, rejecting the petitioner’s argument that a chip complying with the involved wireless communications standard necessarily infringed the petitioner’s ’311 patent


Appeals court denies rehearing of Vonage patent case
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • November 21 2007

Late last week, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit turned down Vonage Holdings’ request for an en banc rehearing of a lower court verdict that held Vonage liable for infringing VoIP-related patents held by Verizon, thus triggering a higher payment for Verizon under a recent settlement agreement signed by the companies


Vonage, Verizon settle patent litigation as AT&T files
  • Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
  • USA
  • October 26 2007

Weeks after paying $80 million to settle patent charges brought by Sprint Nextel, Vonage Holdings the nation’s largest independent provider of voice-over-Internet protocol (VoIP) services reached an agreement with Verizon Communications that will put an end to further litigation between the companies


Court upholds infringement rulings against Vonage for two of three Verizon VoIP patents
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 11 2007

In Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp., Nos. 07-1240, -1251, -1274 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 26, 2007), the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s claim construction, jury instructions, and injunction for two of three Verizon Services Corporation, Verizon Laboratories Inc., or Verizon Communications, Inc. (collectively “Verizon”) patents asserted against Vonage Holdings Corporation and Vonage America, Inc. (collectively “Vonage”) with respect to Voice over Internet Protocol (“VoIP”) technology


Jim FitzSimons
  • Clayton Utz

James Wodarski
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC

Sarah Bro
  • McDermott Will & Emery

Jeffrey M. Telep
  • King & Spalding LLP