We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 173

Federal Circuit holds that there is no per se rule that injunctions are not available for standard essential patents
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • May 16 2014

In an Opinion by Circuit Judge Reyna on April 25, 2014 in Apple Inc. v. Motorola Mobility Inc.,Appeal Nos. 12-1548, 12-1549, a Federal Circuit panel

When supported by specification, numerical range interpreted to permit “minor fluctuations” outside claimed range
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • May 23 2011

In Lexion Medical, LLC v. Northgate Technologies, Inc., No. 09-1494 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 22, 2011) (“Lexion II”), the Federal Circuit affirmed a ruling on SJ that Northgate Technologies, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc., and Linvatec Corp. (collectively “Northgate”) infringed U.S. Patent No. 5,411,474 (“the ’474 patent”) held by Lexion Medical, LLC (“Lexion���

Trading technologies: court reconnect altering judgment to reflect jury award
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • January 21 2011

Judge Schenkier recommended denying plaintiff Trading Technologies' ("TT") motion to enforce the final judgment and for sanctions

Michael T. Renaud
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC

Terrence J. Truax
  • Jenner & Block LLP

Daryn A Grossman
  • Proskauer Rose LLP

Jonathan Zavin
  • Loeb & Loeb LLP

David Erickson
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP

Paul E. Freehling
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Chris A. Johnson
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP