We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 629

The 20 Year War On Patents: When Will It End?
  • Quinn IP Law
  • USA
  • February 21 2017

The Federal Circuit's 1998 State Street Bank decision was a sweeping departure from precedent and opened the floodgates to so-called business method


Patent Application for Blackjack Variation Rejected as Unpatentable Subject Matter
  • PCK Perry + Currier Inc Currier + Kao LLP
  • USA
  • September 6 2016

Makers of new ideas for games have plenty of ways to monetize and protect their intellectual property - copyright to protect the artwork, a good


In Re Smith: A Raw Deal for Inventors?
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • March 22 2016

The recent decision in In re Smith (Fed. Cir. 2016), in which the Federal Circuit affirmed the rejection of claims 1-18 as being ineligible for patent


Analyzing the claims using the framework of Bilski, Mayo and Alice, Federal Circuit finds 101 patent-eligible subject matter in a patent directed to website manipulation
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2014

CAFC held that the district court erred by denying defendants’ motion for JMOL of invalidity of the ’572 patent under 35 U.S.C. 102(a). There was


Alice as game-changer: Federal Circuit changes course on advertising patent in Ultramercial
  • Pierce Atwood LLP
  • USA
  • November 25 2014

The third time is the charm in Ultramercial v. Hulu: After twice finding that an advertising method patent was directed to patent eligible subject


Comparing US and Canadian approaches to determining subject matter eligibility of computer-implemented inventions
  • Gowling WLG
  • USA, Canada
  • October 25 2013

The recent U.S. Federal Circuit decision of Accenture Global Services, GMBH v. Guidewire Software, Inc. (“Accenture”) is a reminder that American law


Time for a respected standard in determining patent eligibility?
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • September 25 2013

One might think that the issue of what qualifies as patentable subject matter has long been resolved by either the U.S. Court of Appeals for the


Ultramercial opinion illuminates Judge Rader’s approach to patent eligible subject matter
  • Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP
  • USA
  • September 19 2013

In June, the Federal Circuit decided Ultramercial, Inc. v. Hulu, LLC, where a three judge panel held that a claim for an internet and


Federal Circuit rules on patentability of business method patent
  • Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
  • USA
  • July 2 2013

The question on appeal was whether the district court erred in dismissing Ultramercial's claims for lack of subject matter eligibility under 101 due


Federal Circuit undecided about whether software is patentable?
  • Fenwick & West LLP
  • USA
  • June 25 2013

Patent holders, inventors, and even the courts have recently struggled with the limits of what can be patented. The patentability of software, widely