We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-4 of 4

Federal Circuit explores when litigation is “reasonably foreseeable” for spoliation purposes
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 19 2011

The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals has issued rulings in companion patent-infringement cases involving the alleged spoliation of documents; at issue was a determination as to when litigation is "reasonably foreseeable," thus triggering a document-preservation duty.

TiVo v. Echostar: parties settle; leave behind new infringement contempt standard
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP
  • USA
  • May 5 2011

While the dispute over TiVo's patents for digital video-recording devices has finally settled for $500 million after seven years, the litigation generated an en banc Federal Circuit Court of Appeals decision that clarified the standards governing contempt proceedings in patent infringement cases.

Madeleine M. McDonough
  • Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP