We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 3,581

Singing the Same Claim Construction Tune: USPTO Adopts Federal Court Claim Construction Standard for AIA Proceedings
  • Bracewell LLP
  • USA
  • October 18 2018

On October 11, 2018, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published notice of a final rule change adopting the claim construction


Can 101 be Overcome for Diagnostic Patent Claims?
  • Vorys Sater Seymour and Pease LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2018

Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. v. Cepheid, No. 2017-1690 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2018) (Roche), marks yet another decision from the Federal Circuit


CAFC Vacated District Court Claim Construction Relying on Alleged Prosecution Disavowal and Affirmed Indefiniteness Determination
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • September 18 2018

In Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. T-Mobile USA, Inc., the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the district court’s grant of summary judgment relying


Petitioner’s Reply May Expand Arguments to Address New Claim Constructions Adopted After Institution
  • Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC
  • USA
  • September 11 2018

In Ericsson Inc. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit vacated and remanded a final written decision of the


USPTO Publishes Update to PTAB Trial Practice Guide
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2018

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has published an update to the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide for inter partes reviews (IPR) and other


Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice Does Not Reset One-Year Time Bar
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • August 30 2018

In Click-To-Call Tech. v. Ingenio, Inc., 2015-1242, slip op. (Fed. Cir. Aug. 16, 2018) (en banc), the Federal Circuit found that a voluntary dismissal


PTAB properly applied the printed matter doctrine
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2018

In Praxair Distrib. v. Mallinckrodt Hosp. Pdts., (Fed. Circ. May 16, 2018), the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s application of the printed matter


PTAB was wrong to ignore an applicant’s prosecution disclaimer because of examiner’s reasons for allowance
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2018

Despite disagreeing with the PTAB’s preferred claim construction, the Federal Circuit in Arendi S.A.R.L. v. Google LLC, Case No. 2016-1249 (Fed. Cir


Institution Denied: Pending Federal Circuit Appeal Warrants Denial of IPR
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • July 27 2018

The PTAB recently exercised its discretion to deny institution of an IPR proceeding because a potentially dispositive claim construction issue was


Patent Owner Must Pay Accused Infringer’s $14 Million Attorney Fees and Costs Because of Prosecution and Litigation Misconduct
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • July 24 2018

A New Jersey court ordered a patent owner to pay $14 million to a company it sued for patent infringement to reimburse that company for its