We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 349

PTAB Must Consider Numerous Factors When Determining Whether Meeting Materials Are “Publicly-Accessible” Prior Art Publications
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • August 8 2018

In Medtronic, Inc. v. Barry, Appeal Nos. 2017-1169, 2017-1170, in determining whether materials distributed at meetings or conferences are reasonably


Biodelivery Sciences Intl., Inc. v. Aquestive Therapeutics, Inc.
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 31 2018

A party did not waive SAS-based relief in an IPR appeal when it requested remand for consideration of non-instituted claims shortly after issuance of


Nantkwest v. Iancu
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 30 2018

En Banc (excl. Chen), Opinion for the court filed by Stoll, joined by Newman, Lourie, Moore, O’Malley, Wallach, and Taranto


Interval Licensing LLC v. AOL, Inc.
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 23 2018

A patent claim is directed to an abstract idea where it broadly recites a result without defining how the result is achieved other than through


Saint Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 23 2018

Generic drug manufacturers petitioned for IPR of Allergan’s patents relating to the dry eye treatment Restasis. The Board instituted the IPR, but


Blackbird Tech LLC v. Elb Electronics, Inc.
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 17 2018

A limitation in the specification should not be imported into a claim when there is no evidence that the limitation is important, essential or


Tf3 limited v. Tre Milano, LLC
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 16 2018

Tre Milano requested Inter Partes Review of a patent owned by TF3. The patent at issue describes a hair styling device that


Raytheon Company v. Indigo Systems Corporation, Flir Systems Incorporated
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 16 2018

The Texas Theft Liability Act (TTLA), which awards attorney’s fees to the prevailing party, does not permit the recovery of attorney’s fees for trade


Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 16 2018

References were sufficiently accessible to the public to constitute printed publication prior art even if they were not searchable or indexed because


Polara Engineering Inc v. Campbell Company
  • Knobbe Martens
  • USA
  • July 12 2018

Before Lourie, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California