We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 150

USPTO Publishes Update to PTAB Trial Practice Guide
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • August 30 2018

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has published an update to the Office Patent Trial Practice Guide for inter partes reviews (IPR) and other


The Federal Circuit Reverses and Vacates the District Court’s Dismissal Under Rule 12(b)(6), for not Considering Allegations of Fact That Could Preclude Dismissal
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • February 14 2018

Appellant Aatrix appealed the District Court’s dismissal under Rule 12(b)(6), in which the District Court considered asserted claims invalid as


The Federal Circuit Reverses and Vacates Invalidity Determinations by the Board After Lack of Substantial Evidence Supported the Board’s Findings
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • February 12 2018

Appellant Hodges appealed the Board’s affirmance of the examiner’s rejection of all claims as anticipated andor obvious. The CAFC reversed the


Ford Succeeds In Invalidating Some, But Not All, Claims Of Two Paice’s Patents Related To Hybrid Vehicles
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2018

Patent owner Paice appealed from PTAB’s final written decisions in six inter partes reviews (“IPR”) holding certain challenged claims of its two


Patents for Real Estate Searching on a Computer Are Invalid Under Section 101
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2018

Real Estate Alliance (“REAL”) appealed District Court’s summary judgment invalidating one of its asserted patents under section 101 for claiming


Ford Succeeds In Invalidating More Claims Of Two Paice’s Patents Related To Hybrid Vehicles
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • February 1 2018

Paice appealed from PTAB’s final written decisions in eight inter partes reviews (“IPRs”) holding certain challenged claims of its two hybrid-vehicle


CAFC Upholds Jury Verdict Form’s Condition That A Patent’s Validity Only Be Considered After A Determination That The Patent Was Infringed
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • January 19 2018

Globus appealed decisions by E.D. Tex denying its Rule 59(e) motion to amend the judgment and dismissing its Rule 50(b) motion for a judgment as a


Summary Judgment of No Invalidity Cannot Be Based Solely on Patent Surviving Reexamination
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • January 12 2018

Defendant-Appellant Briggs appealed several of the Nebraska district court’s orders: (1) summary judgment of no anticipation or obviousness; (2)


Employee Contract Language “Will Assign” Patent Rights Does Not Itself Effect an Assignment of Patent Rights
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • January 11 2018

Plaintiff-Appellant Advanced Video appealed the Southern District of New York’s dismissal for lack of standing based on a finding that a co-owner of


Damages Must Be Apportioned Such that Infringing and Non-Infringing Features Are Separated; Royalty Base Must Have Some Factual Basis Beyond “Starting Point” Licensing Offers
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • January 10 2018

Defendant-Appellant Blue Coat Systems appealed a N.D. Cal. Jury verdict awarding damages for infringement of four patents as well as the district