We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 12

Federal Circuit affirms Commission’s finding of no domestic industry
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • April 16 2015

On March 20, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit decided LSI Corporation v. International Trade Commission, No


Oral argument fails to shed light on the outcome of anticipated en banc Federal Circuit decision in Suprema
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • February 13 2015

On February 8, oral argument was held before the en banc Federal Circuit in Suprema v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, Case No. 2012-1170. The panel decision in


Patent Bar Associations and Tech Industry divided on how Federal Circuit should decide Suprema
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2014

On August 18, 2014, the American Intellectual Property Lawyers Association ("AIPLA"), Intellectual Property Owners Association ("IPO"), Dell Inc


Former Chief Judge Randall Rader retires from the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2014

Judge Randall Rader announced his retirement from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, effective June 30, 2014. Judge Rader's


Federal Circuit confirms that a substantial domestic industry investment under 19 U.S.C. 1337(a)(3)(C) must relate to an actual article that practices the patent manufactured domestically or abroad
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • October 17 2013

On October 3, 2013, in Microsoft v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 2012-1445,-1535, the Federal Circuit upheld a Commission decision that Microsoft failed to


Samsung Appeals Commission final determination on three patents that were not the subject of the White House’s decision
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2013

2013, Samsung filed a Petition for Review with the Federal Circuit appealing the Commission's Final Determination in the 794 Investigation. In view


Federal Circuit oral argument in Apple v. Samsung permanent injunction squabble
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • August 21 2013

On August 9, 2013, a Federal Circuit three judge panel presided at oral argument (Appeal No. 2013-1129) to determine whether U.S. District Court


International Trade Commission and Federal Circuit clarify standards for satisfying a domestic industry based on licensing activities in Section 337 cases
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • December 19 2011

Two recent decisions increase the level of scrutiny on the domestic industry standard under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 when a complainant’s domestic activity consists solely of licensing activities.


International Trade Commission and Federal Circuit clarify standards for satisfying a domestic industry based on licensing activities in Section 337 cases
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • December 14 2011

Two recent decisions clarify the domestic industry standard under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 when a complainant’s domestic activity consists solely of licensing activities.


Federal Circuit rebuffs commerce for inconsistent new zeroing policy
  • King & Spalding LLP
  • USA
  • May 4 2011

In a case with potentially broad ramifications for U.S. users of the trade laws, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit questioned the Department of Commerce’s strategy for bringing its antidumping practice into compliance with WTO law with respect to “zeroing.”