We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 10,848

CAFC denies rehearing en banc in Mentor Graphics lost profits case
  • Fish & Richardson PC
  • USA
  • October 18 2017

The Federal Circuit, in Mentor Graphics Corp. v. EVE-USA, Inc. (also including Synopsys, Inc. as a defendant), Nos. 2015-1470, 2015-1554, 2015-1556


Commercial arbitration awards possibly subject to increased judicial scrutiny
  • Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz PC
  • USA
  • October 18 2017

Pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act and the United Nations Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, arbitration


Return to Sender: Mail Tracking with Barcodes and URLs Found Not Patent Eligible
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 18 2017

In Secured Mail Solutions LLC v. Universal Wilde, Inc., No. 16-1728 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 16, 2017), the Federal Circuit affirmed the lower court’s


U.S. Federal Circuit Deems Software Innovation is Patent-Eligible, But Not Infringed
  • PCK Perry + Currier Inc Currier + Kao LLP
  • Canada, USA
  • October 17 2017

This rare decision bucks the current US trend of invalidating software patents as mere abstract theorems as started by the decision in Alice Corp Pty


Subject-Matter Eligibility Swallows Infringement Litigation?
  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • USA
  • October 17 2017

On October 4, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit heard oral arguments in a case that has been running for more than 10


The Demise of Rule 36 Judgments in Federal Circuit Decisions Relating to IPRs
  • Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC
  • USA
  • October 17 2017

The Federal Circuit issued a fairly mundane decision today in Boundary Solutions, Inc. v. Corelogic, Inc.(PTAB October 17, 2017), affirming the PTAB’s


Determining 'regular and established place of business' under patent venue statute
  • Fitzpatrick, Cella, Harper & Scinto
  • USA
  • October 16 2017

On September 21 2017 a Federal Circuit panel rejected an Eastern District of Texas judge's proposed four-factor test for determining whether venue


Federal Circuit Rejects PTAB’s Construction as Overly Broad
  • Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC
  • USA
  • October 16 2017

Claim 28 provides “An expandable downhole tool for use in a drilling assembly positioned within a wellbore having an original diameter borehole and


Aqua Products, Inc. v. Matal: A Boon for Patent Owners
  • Workman Nydegger
  • USA
  • October 16 2017

Since coming online September 16, 2012, inter partes review proceedings, or IPRs as they have become called, are widely regarded as a significant risk


IPR and CBM Statistics for Final Written Decisions Issued in September 2017
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2017

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board issued 33 IPR and CBM Final Written Decisions in September, cancelling 501 (87.28) instituted claims while