Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Jurisdiction

Work area

Firm name

Date from

Date to

Results: 1-10 of 11,579

Colour it mine: protecting colour trademarks

Smart & Biggar/Fetherstonhaugh
Canada, European Union
May 21 2018

Colours can function as source indicators and many acquire distinctiveness over time. For example, when thinking of green in association with farm

Mandamus for the rest of us-The Federal Circuit continues its trend of clarifying patent venue post-TC Heartland

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
USA
May 18 2018

On May 22, 2017, the Supreme Court fundamentally narrowed patent venue by unanimously holding in TC Heartland that patent holders must follow the

Nearly One Year After TC Heartland, Federal Circuit Addresses Unanswered Venue Questions in a Trio of Decisions

Ropes & Gray LLP
USA
May 17 2018

Almost one year after the Supreme Court’s landmark patent venue decision in TC Heartland LLC v. Kraft Foods Group Brands LLC, the Federal Circuit

Federal Circuit Declines to Alter Alien Venue Rule in Patent Cases Post-TC Heartland

K&L Gates
USA
May 17 2018

On Wednesday, May 9, 2018, the Federal Circuit settled another question raised by last year’s TC Heartland decision and reaffirmed the

Patents: Developing Issues in Post Grant Patent Challenges

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
USA
May 16 2018

4 Key Takeaways: Supreme Court Update: The Supreme Court’s recent Oil States v. Green’s Energy Group

Venue Options Get Smaller in BigCommerce

Vinson & Elkins LLP
USA
May 16 2018

On May 15, 2018, the Federal Circuit granted BigCommerce, Inc.’s petition for a writ of mandamus and held that for purposes of determining venue

Federal Circuit Holds Google’s Copying of Java API Not a Fair Use

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
USA
May 15 2018

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit considered whether Google’s copying of Oracle’s Java API for integration into its Android smartphone

Anacor Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Iancu

Knobbe Martens
USA
May 15 2018

A petitioner in an Inter Partes Review may introduce new evidence not included in its petition if: 1) the evidence is a reply to evidence introduced

In Re: Bigcommerce, Inc.

Knobbe Martens
USA
May 15 2018

A corporation incorporated in a state having multiple judicial districts “resides” for purposes of the patent venue statute only in the single

SAP America, INC. v. Investpic LLC

Knobbe Martens
USA
May 15 2018

Claims may be determined patent ineligible on the pleadings where no facts are asserted from which a non-abstract improvement may be plausibly

Current Search

Refine

Content type

Tags