Investment advisers registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or with a state (“Advisers”) as well as commodity pool
On April 17, 2012, the ICI and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce filed a lawsuit against the Commodity Futures Trading Commission challenging the legality of recently enacted amendments to CFTC Rule 4.5.
On February 9, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced the adoption of final amendments to CFTC Rule 4.5 and other CFTC rules regarding registration and compliance obligations for commodity pool operators and commodity trading advisors.
On February 9, 2012, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced the adoption of final rules amending the registration and compliance obligations for commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs).
As reported in our recent IP Client Alert, the U.S. Supreme Court has issued its decision in Bilski v. Kappos concerning the boundaries of what constitutes patentable subject matter.
On June 28, 2010, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated decision in Bilski v. Kappos.
In the November 2008 issue of this Newsletter, we reported the highly anticipated en banc Federal Circuit decision in In re Bilski.
On October 30, 2008, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its highly anticipated en banc decision in In re Bilski, ruling that the determination whether a claimed method constitutes patent-eligible subject matter requires an analysis under a “machine-or-transformation test.”