We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Clear all

Refine your search

Content type

23 results found


Proskauer Rose LLP | USA | 28 Apr 2015

Supreme Court preserves states' power to protect consumers but in the process blurs federal preemption analysis

The Supreme Court once again showed that, when it comes to the antitrust laws, the consumer is king. In Oneok, Inc. v. Learjet, the Court was asked


Proskauer Rose LLP | USA | 22 Oct 2014

Regulators continue to address high-frequency trading

Regulators across markets continue to show interest in high frequency trading and algorithmic trading generally. Recent developments in this area


Proskauer Rose LLP | USA | 29 Jul 2010

Supreme Court clarifies test for patent-eligible processes

An application designed to hedge risk in the field of commodities trading is ineligible for patent protection because it is an unpatentable abstract idea, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled.


Proskauer Rose LLP | USA | 29 Jun 2010

Bilski v. Kappos: the Supreme Court clarifies the test for patent-eligible processes

On June 28, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Bilski v. Kappos, the high court’s most anticipated decision in the area of patent law in years.

Previous page 1 2 3