We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type


Firm name


243 results found


Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP | USA | 24 Aug 2011

Paige Capital Management, LLC, et al. v. Lerner Master Fund, LLC et al

In this opinion, the Delaware Court of Chancery refused to permit management of a hedge fund (the “Paige Fund”) to utilize the provisions of the partnership agreement of the Paige Fund’s Delaware investment vehicle to restrict the withdrawal by the Paige Fund’s only outside investor of its entire capital investment finding, among other things, that imposing such restrictions was a breach of a separate agreement entered into with such investor as well as a breach of fiduciary duty by management of the Paige Fund.


Kelley Drye & Warren LLP | USA | 3 Feb 2011

Madoff Trustee vs. The Wilpons - meet the mess

Fred Wilpon, the owner of the New York Mets, was a close friend of Bernie Madoff, and it has been generally believed since the outset of the scandal that Wilpon, his family and affiliated enterprises lost hundreds of millions in the great Ponzi scheme.


Ropes & Gray LLP | USA | 26 Oct 2010

Fraudulent conveyance clawback: the "good faith" defense

In a much-followed case given the recent publicity surrounding collapsed Ponzi schemes, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 17, 2010 reversed a decision of the Bankruptcy Court from the Southern District of New York that had broadened the scope of those facts and circumstances that may trigger inquiry notice under the "good faith" defense to a fraudulent conveyance claim.


Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | USA | 30 Sep 2010

Clawback of fraudulent transfers from investors“good faith” defense update

Given the overarching Madoff Ponzi scheme as well as other mini-Madoff schemes that surfaced in its wake, many have been following issues arising from the ability of a trustee to claw back transfers (either as preferential or as fraudulent transfers) from investors who redeemed their interests in a private investment fund or managed account that turned out to be a Ponzi scheme.


Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP | USA | 15 Apr 2009

Kuroda v. SPJS Holdings, LLC

In this case, the Court granted in part and denied in part the Defendants’ 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...