We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

9 results found

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 8 Aug 2011

Developments in intercarrier compensation

On August 3, 2011, a Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PAPUC) administrative law judge (ALJ) denied the petition for emergency relief filed by Core Communications, Inc. on which we reported in the August 1 edition of This Week in Telecom.

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 23 May 2011

In the courts

On May 17, 2011, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the FCC’s order staying the petition of North County Communications for payment of traffic termination charges while North County petitioned the California PUC to set a rate.

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 21 Feb 2011

Developments in intercarrier compensation

On February 14, 2011, the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (MPUC) issued an amended scheduling order in a complaint case filed by Qwest Communications Company, LLC against Tekstar Communications, Inc.

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 17 Dec 2010

Intercarrier comp

On December 16, 2010, the New York Public Service Commission (NY PSC) voted unanimously to initiate an investigation into Verizon's intrastate access rates.

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 20 Sep 2010

Developments in intercarrier compensation

On September 16, 2010, Verizon New York, Inc. filed petitions to reject access tariffs filed by XYN Communications of New York, LLC and Integrated Path Communications, LLC with the New York Public Service Commission (NY PSC).

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 30 Aug 2010

Developments in intercarrier compensation

On August 26, 2010, the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) granted the joint petition of Level 3 Communications, LLC and AT&T Kansas to hold Level 3's complaint against AT&T in abeyance while the parties seek to negotiate a settlement.

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 23 Aug 2010

Developments in intercarrier compensation

On August 16, 2010, Sprint Communications Company filed a complaint against Native American Telecom, LLC (NAT) with the US District Court for the District of South Dakota, alleging that NAT is unlawfully billing Sprint for traffic destined for so-called "Call Connection Companies."

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 16 Aug 2010

Developments in intercarrier compensation

On August 12, 2010, Aventure Communication Technology, LLC filed a motion to stay with the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) urging it to suspend its investigation of Aventure's recently filed intrastate access services tariff.

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 9 Aug 2010

Developments in intercarrier compensation

On August 5, 2010, AT&T Communications of the Midwest opposed the motion for stay filed by Native American Telecom, LLC (NAT) with the South Dakota Public Utilities Commission (SD PUC) in a complaint proceeding initiated by Sprint Communications Company L.P. regarding access charges.

Previous page 1 Next page