We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Clear all

Refine your search

Content type



138 results found


Jones Day | USA | 19 Apr 2019

Polymorph Patent Not Invalid as Obvious

The Federal Circuit upholds the validity of a patent covering a polymorphic form of a chemical compound


Jones Day | USA | 14 Dec 2018

Typical SupplierCo-Defendant Is Not An RPI Or Privy

In a recently published decision, the PTAB held that Samsung’s petition for inter partes review of a patent owned by The SEVEN Networks LLC was not


Jones Day | USA | 11 Dec 2018

Board Grants Discovery Regarding RPI Issues

In Cavium, LLC v. Alacritech, Inc., Case IPR2018-00401 (PTAB Nov. 20, 2018) (Paper 24), the PTAB granted a Patent Owner’s motion for additional


Jones Day | USA | 7 Dec 2018

Precedential Opinion Panel to Review Same-Party Joinder

In September, the Patent Office revised Standing Operating Procedure 2 (available here) to create a new review path for designating opinions


Jones Day | USA | 3 Dec 2018

SCOTUS Rejects Petition To Review Section 325(d)

On November 19, 2018, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) rejected a petition to review the PTAB’s refusal to deny IPR institution under


Jones Day | USA | 30 Nov 2018

PTAB Declines Review of “Follow-On” Petition By Different Party

The PTAB has discretion to deny “follow-on” petitions that challenge the validity of a patent that has been previously subjected to inter partes


Jones Day | USA | 23 Jul 2018

Claim Constructions Under the Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Standard Must be Reasonable

On July 13, 2018, the Federal Circuit reversed the PTAB’s finding that claims 1-5 and 11 of U.S. Patent No. 8,651,118 (“the ’118 Patent”) are


Jones Day | USA | 24 Jun 2018

Federal Circuit Grants Rehearing and Remands IPR to PTAB post-SAS

Last week, the Federal Circuit granted, in part, a panel rehearing request and remanded an IPR to the PTAB in view of SAS to address claims that were


Jones Day | USA | 7 Jun 2018

Indefiniteness Standard Applicable in PGRs: Reasonably Certain or Clear?

Whether a claim is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112 is analyzed under different standards by District Courts and the PTAB. District Courts apply the


Jones Day | USA | 29 May 2018

Institution Denied: No Genuine Issue of Material Fact Where Petitioner Relies on Incorrect Claim Construction

The PTAB’s recent decision denying rehearing in United Microelectronics Corp. v. Lone Star Silicon Innovations LLC, IPR2017-01513, Paper 10 (PTAB May

Previous page 1 2 3 ...