We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 260

Eligibility for a Covered Business Method Review
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • July 26 2018

By: Sean Benevento1, Mike Lavine, and Matt Johnson The PTAB recently clarified eligibility for a covered business method review (CBM). See Xerox

Another Lesson in Timing for Disclaimers in CBM Reviews
  • Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC
  • USA
  • June 11 2018

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) recently held that Customedia Technologies, LLC (“Customedia”) could not moot the CBM proceeding with

Internet Advertising Claims Deemed Not Eligible for Covered Business Method Patent Review
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • March 13 2017

In a decision dated February 27, 2017, the Board denied institution of Google Inc.’s petition for Covered Business Method Patent Review of claims 20

The Federal Circuit Narrows the Scope of Covered Business Method Review By Limiting Review to Claims that Cover Activities Financial in Nature
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • March 6 2017

The Federal Circuit issued a decision in Secure Axcess, LLC v. PNC Bank Nat’l Ass’n, No. 2016-1353, 2017 WL 676601 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 21, 2017). In its

Federal Circuit Clarifies Scope of Covered Business Method Review
  • Mintz
  • USA
  • February 27 2017

The Federal Circuit has further clarified the scope of the Covered Business Method (CBM) review program under the America Invents Act (AIA)

Web Page Authentication Patent is Outside the Scope of CBM Review
  • Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP
  • USA
  • February 21 2017

To qualify for CBM review, a patent must claim “the practice, administration, or management of a financial product or service.” Claims that are only

Post-Unwired Planet, Are Pending CBMs Safe?
  • Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, PC
  • USA
  • December 27 2016

The standard governing which patents can be attacked in Covered Business Method (CBM) patent review proceedings has received renewed attention

PTAB Should Have Canceled All Challenged Claims in CBM Reviews
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • December 27 2016

In Apple, Inc. v. Ameranth, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2016), the Federal Circuit reviewed the final written decisions in CBM reviews of three related patents

Unwired Planet: Covered Business Methods And The Tangled Web of Serial Distortion Dec 14, 2016
  • Bereskin & Parr LLP
  • USA
  • December 14 2016

On November 21, 2016, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit released its decision in Unwired Planet v. Google Inc. concerning the

PTAB May Institute an IPR Proceeding on a Subset of Challenged Claims
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • December 2 2016

The Federal Circuit recently denied a petition for rehearing en banc, effectively reiterating that the PTAB may, in its sole discretion, choose to