We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 244

A Party May Comply With Rule 34 By Identifying Its Search Parameters As Opposed To Identifying Withheld Documents
  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • USA
  • September 13 2016

According to a recent decision of the U.S. District Court for the District of Kansas, a party may satisfy its obligations under Rule 34 whenin


Divided En Banc Court Overrules FOIA Precedent
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • July 15 2016

In 1996, in Detroit Free Press v. Dept. of Justice, 73 F.3d 93 (6th Cir. 1996) ("Free Press I"), the Sixth Circuit held that the Freedom of


Search & retrieval
  • Winston & Strawn LLP
  • USA
  • October 31 2011

Courts continue to encourage parties to cooperate in crafting search protocols, to utilize a phased approach to production, and to consider proportionality in order to control costs and conserve judicial resources.


Frangione v. Vandongen et al., 2010 ONSC 2823.
  • Gowling WLG
  • Canada
  • October 17 2011

Plaintiff was involved in two car accidents in respect of which he claimed he had suffered head and neck injuries which caused him loss of enjoyment of life.


E-discovery basics: processing & reviewing ESI
  • Gibson Dunn & Crutcher LLP
  • USA
  • July 5 2011

After preserving and collecting electronically stored information ("ESI"), the next step is to determine what is relevant (or responsive to document requests or a subpoena), versus what is privileged, irrelevant or non-responsive


Balancing the costs of privilege review with the risks of waiver
  • Mayer Brown
  • USA
  • March 31 2011

A large financial institution is responding to discovery requests in connection with an investor suit relating to certain financial products marketed by the institution.


"ECA" tools enhance efficiency, reduce litigation costs
  • LeClairRyan
  • USA
  • December 17 2010

"ECA" is one of the more misunderstood acronyms in the legal marketplace, despite the buzz it is generating throughout the ediscovery industry.


Important changes coming in January 2011 for European patent applications
  • Pillsbury
  • European Union
  • December 13 2010

Inventors, applicants and assignees should be aware of key changes to European patent practice which will be implemented from January 2011.


New EPO information disclosure requirements entering into effect on January 1, 2011
  • Jones Day
  • European Union
  • December 7 2010

According to the European Patent Convention's current Implementing Regulations, an inventor applying for a European patent may be invited by the European Patent Office ("EPO") to submit information on prior art that was taken into consideration in the examination of related national or regional patent applications.


Additional CMS guidance on Final Rule
  • Proskauer Rose LLP
  • USA
  • November 23 2010

The Final Rule addresses other disclosure issues in the Comments and Response section: the disclosure requirement applies only to the advanced imaging services specified in Section 6003 of the PPACA, which are MRI, CT, and PET services.