We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 3,699

What Classic Quid Pro Quo Sexual Harassment Looks Like
  • FisherBroyles LLP
  • USA
  • December 12 2018

Of the types of sexual harassment, the one we see far less of is quid pro quo harassment. Why? Because it’s SO OBVIOUSLY wrong that most perpetrators


Managing the employment relationship in California
  • DLA Piper
  • USA, Global
  • December 12 2018

A structured guide to country specific laws, misclassification and contracts in California


California Appellate Panel: No Fees, Costs for Nonfrivolous FEHA Cases
  • Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP
  • USA
  • December 5 2018

An award to a prevailing party for fees and costs after the losing party rejected a Section 998 pretrial settlement offer does not


What do you do with half a story? Ask yourself these four questions.
  • Rubin Thomlinson LLP
  • Canada
  • December 5 2018

A complainant files a harassment or discrimination complaint and then quits. A respondent says the allegations are ridiculous and


The Emotional Investigation: navigating the difference between feeling and being harassed
  • Rubin Thomlinson LLP
  • Canada
  • December 3 2018

A complainant provides me with an email, a text message or a recollection of an interaction with a respondent and they say that this is a sign of


Proposed Title IX Regulations From the U.S. Department of Education
  • Krieg DeVault
  • USA
  • December 3 2018

The U.S. Department of Education recently released long-awaited proposed Title IX regulations, outlining how the Department of Education’s Office of


Update on Ohio’s online harassment statute
  • Graydon Head & Ritchey LLP
  • USA
  • November 28 2018

A few weeks ago, I reported in our InfoLaw Newsletter about a case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The suit challenged


NYC Releases FAQs Relating to Sexual Harassment Legislation
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • November 26 2018

The New York City Commission of Human Rights (the “Commission”) recently issued a set of Frequently Asked Questions (the “FAQs”) setting forth its


EAT approves use of indiscriminatingly inappropriate banter? Not really (UK)
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • United Kingdom
  • November 15 2018

If I told you that calling a colleague with links to the Traveller community a “fat ginger pikey” might not be harassment, you would be forgiven for


Social media to be next big legal minefield for firms
  • Philip Lee
  • Ireland
  • November 12 2018

That’s fine as far as private life goes, but what happens when an employee’s social media postings affect their employer’s business? It’s an