We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

Content type

Tags

Firm name

Author

327 results found

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 28 Sep 2011

Another fair-use victory for the studios: makers of South Park immune from copyright infringement claim of viral video creator

South Park Digital Studios, Comedy Partners, MTV Networks, Paramount Home Entertainment Inc., and Viacom International Inc. have successfully defended themselves against federal claims of copyright infringement related to an April 2, 2008, episode of the popular Comedy Central television program South Park.

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 30 Aug 2011

Wisconsin court: absent unusual circumstances, patent complaint must include identification of asserted claims and accused product

In a patent case filed in the Western District of Wisconsin, Defendant Digecor, Inc. moved to dismiss plaintiff Hunts Point Ventures, Inc.'s complaint for failing to identify the asserted claims or the accused product.

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 5 Jul 2011

Merely stating that testing of potentially infringing products is expensive is not good cause to amend infringement contentions under Northern District of California's Patent Rules

Recently, a Court in the Central District of California, applying the Patent Rules from the Northern District of California, held that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate the requisite good cause to amend its infringement contentions to add additional accused products.

Article

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP | USA | 14 Jun 2011

No abuse of discretion in disallowing late and prejudicial amendment

In 1993, hip-hop group Cypress Hill released its "Black Sunday" album.

Article

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP | USA | 11 Oct 2010

VSI v. Creative Pipe: the evolution of the obligation to preserve ESI

It has been seven years since Judge Sheindlin issued the first of her six Zubulake opinions, addressing in detail the obligations of litigants to preserve and produce relevant electronically stored information ("ESI").

Article

Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 28 Oct 2009

Pythagoras Intellectual Holdings LLC v. Stegall, et al.

In patent, trademark and copyright infringement action, court grants defendants’ motion for attorney’s fees in relation to the copyright and trademark claims, holding that plaintiffs’ copyright claims are frivolous.

Article

Davies Collison Cave | Australia | 28 May 2009

Lynx Engineering Consultants Pty Ltd v The ANI Corporation Limited trading as ANI Bradken Rail Transportation Group

In 2006 Lynx commenced these proceedings by way of an application for pre trial discovery against Worley Parsons.

Article

Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 15 Apr 2009

Diplomatic Man, Inc. v. Nike, Inc

The court awarded defendant Nike attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $324,855.69 after dismissing plaintiff Diplomatic Man, Inc.’s copyright infringement action with prejudice for failure to prosecute.

Article

Bricker & Eckler LLP | USA | 25 Jan 2008

Court orders terminating sanctions after widespread and systematic efforts to destroy evidence by defendants

In a case that initially garnered notice for the court’s order to preserve server log data temporarily stored in RAM, the court has now granted terminating sanctions, entering default judgment against defendants.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...