We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type



5 results found


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 25 May 2011

William A. Graham Co. v. Haughey

The Third Circuit held that, in an action brought in 2004 for copyright infringement, where the defendant is found to be liable for copyright infringement dating back to 1992, the court may assess pre-judgment interest against the defendant


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 19 May 2010

William A. Graham Co. v. Haughey, et al

Court holds that prejudgment interest is appropriate in this case because it provides full compensation to the plaintiff and acts as a deterrent to willful copyright infringement; court calculates prejudgment interest from the date the infringement began, not the date plaintiff learned of the infringement.


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 10 Feb 2010

Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., et al.

In copyright infringement suit brought by the heir of an author of a screenplay that allegedly became the basis of the motion picture Raging Bull against the copyright owners of the picture, district court grants defendants’ motion for summary judgment based on the equitable defense of laches where plaintiff had knowledge of the legal theories asserted in the action as early as 1990 and refrained from filing suit until 2009 because the picture was allegedly not yet profitable.

Previous page 1 Next page