We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

Content type

Tags

Firm name

Author

435 results found

Article

Beijing Sanyou Intellectual Property Agency Ltd | China | 28 Feb 2017

Sanyou IP News

On January 14, 2017, Sanyou was honored as the “China Outstanding IPR Service Team in 2016” in the Awards Gala and Appreciation Dinner of the 7th China IP New Year Forum and 2017 IP Manager Annual Meeting

Article

Gowling WLG | Canada | 7 Sep 2016

Copyright infringement claim successful by way of application

In the recent decision of Microsoft Corporation v Liu, the Federal Court granted Microsoft's application in part, finding that the respondent, Mr

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 27 Sep 2011

Is "the 25 percent rule" still alive after Uniloc?

Parties and courts had come to rely on the so-called "25 percent rule" as a way of calculating a reasonably royalty rate in patent infringement cases.

Article

McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 24 Aug 2011

Motorola identifies Microsoft products accused of infringement

In response to Order No. 11 in Inv. No. 337-TA-752, Certain Gaming and Entertainment Consoles, Related Software, and Components Thereof (“753 Investigation), Motorola filed a statement identifying the products it is accusing of infringement in the 752 Investigation.

Article

Holland & Knight LLP | USA | 11 May 2011

Patent damages 25 rule is dead

On January 4, 2011, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit found that the so-called “25 percent rule of thumb” analysis long used by damages experts in patent cases to calculate a “reasonable royalty” is “fundamentally flawed.” Uniloc v. Microsoft (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Article

Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 13 Apr 2011

Bean v. Pearson Education, Inc

Court denies plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction in copyright infringement action, holding that plaintiffs failed to establish irreparable harm.

Article

Chadbourne & Parke LLP | USA | 1 Apr 2011

US patent infringement damages: continuing the return to reason

In its Uniloc decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit provided much-needed clarification on the calculation of damages in patent infringement lawsuits.

Article

Baker Botts LLP | USA | 29 Mar 2011

Raising the bar on proving damages - Uniloc vs. Microsoft

“A reasonable royalty is the predominant measure of damages in patent infringement cases.”

Article

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP | USA | 22 Mar 2011

Rejection of the 25 rule in the calculation of a reasonable royalty rate

Though the "25 Rule," which presumes that 25 percent of the operating profit from the sale of an infringing good is a reasonable royalty rate, has been frequently relied upon as a starting point in calculating patent infringement damages for more than 40 years, the Federal Circuit recently held that this rule of thumb "is a fundamentally flawed tool.

Article

Steptoe & Johnson LLP | USA | 17 Mar 2011

Cybersquatting update: new protections for brand owners

Brand owners have recently been given new weapons in the never-ending battle against cybersquatters.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...