We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type


Firm name


475 results found


Arent Fox LLP | USA | 15 Mar 2017

In Fight Between Moose Knuckles and Counterfeiters, It’s a KO for the Retailer

An Illinois federal court recently awarded the Canadian retailer Moose Knuckles a $52 million default judgment related to claims of trademark


Hogan Lovells | China | 19 Jul 2016

Setting the right example: China’s highest court selects its “top 10 significant IP cases of 2015”

China’s Supreme People’s Court (“SPC”) has recently published its list of top 10 IP cases for 2015. One of 2015’s top 10 cases (the Blizzard


Williams Mullen | USA | 15 Sep 2011

The joinder provision in the Patent Reform Act: leveling the playing field against multi-defendant NPE suits

A new season is under way and some of the rules have changed.


Heenan Blaikie LLP | USA, Canada | 8 Sep 2011

The charm of PandoraTM

Modifiable and customizable jewellery is increasing in popularity.


Winston & Strawn LLP | USA | 17 Aug 2011

Corporate officer may be personally liable for copyright infringement

Blue Nile, an online jewelry and diamond retailer, sued Ideal Diamond Solutions (IDS) for copyright infringement alleging that IDS used Blue Nile's copyrighted images on IDS' website and sought to hold IDS's founder, Larry Chasin, personally liable.


Gowling WLG | European Union | 12 Jul 2011

Brand owners cautiously jubilant following ruling of Court of Justice in L'Oreal v eBay

The Court of Justice of the European Union has handed down its judgment in the case of L'Oréal v eBay and overall it is good news for brand owners.


Davies Collison Cave | Australia | 10 Dec 2010

Parallel imports can infringe a registered Australian trade mark

The Federal Court of Australia has recently confirmed that even though goods bearing a trade mark registered in have been manufactured overseas with the consent of the Australian trade mark owner the unauthorised importation of those goods into and the sale of those goods in may infringe the registered trade mark.


Herbert Smith Freehills LLP | United Kingdom | 23 Nov 2010

Suppliers beware broad scope given to provisions regarding indirect infringement of patents

A supplier of goods may be liable for indirect patent infringement under s60(2) Patents Act 1977 if he supplies goods in the UK which, although not in themselves infringing, are capable of being modified, or used in conjunction with other goods, to infringe a UK patent, if the supplier knows (or it was obvious in the circumstances) that the goods are suitable for and intended by customers down the supply chain to put a patented invention into effect.


Locke Lord LLP | USA | 28 Sep 2010

Copyright first sale doctrine does not apply to resale of licensed software

Generally, when someone purchases a CD containing software, or a DVD containing a video game, they believe they own the item.


Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP | USA | 31 May 2010

Federal Circuit jurisdiction requires resolution of a patent law issue as a theory of relief

In ClearPlay, Inc. v. Abecassis, No. 09-1471 (Fed. Cir. Apr. 21, 2010), the Federal Circuit held that it lacked appellate jurisdiction over a case relating to a dispute stemming from the parties’ license agreement, and transferred the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...