We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type


Firm name


129 results found


Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP | USA | 14 Jun 2016

Court Finds an Agreement Not-to-Sue is a Patent License Despite Language to the Contrary

A Minnesota court required a patent owner to provide the accused infringer with documents relating to an agreement after finding that the agreement


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 20 Oct 2010

Capitol Records, Inc. v. Thomas-Rasset

In a copyright infringement action, the court rejected the defendant’s request for a jury instruction that states “statutory damages must bear a reasonable relationship to the harm suffered by each plaintiff.”


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 27 Jan 2010

Capitol Records Inc., et al. v. Thomas-Rasset

In peer-to-peer copyright infringement action, court grants defendant’s motion for remittitur and reduces jury’s statutory damage award from $1,920,000 to $54,000 after holding that jury’s statutory damages award is shocking and unjust; court concludes that treble the minimum statutory damages amount of $750 per song is the maximum amount the jury could properly have awarded.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...