We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type



9 results found


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 27 Apr 2011

Latin American Music Co. v. ASCAP

First Circuit affirms award of attorney’s fees to defendant in copyright infringement action, rejecting plaintiff’s argument that attorney’s fees are not appropriate because plaintiff’s copyright was not timely registered, and finding that plaintiff’s claim was “objectively weak.”


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 23 Mar 2011

Cariou v. Prince

Court holds that defendant’s use of plaintiff’s photographs to create “appropriation art” is not a fair use because it does not comment on the original photographs and is not transformative; court also holds that gallery that exhibited and sold defendant’s “appropriation art” is directly, vicariously and contributorily liable for copyright infringement.


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 19 Jan 2011

Cabell v. Sony Pictures Entertainment, Inc.

In copyright infringement action against producers of the motion picture You Don’t Mess With the Zohan, court awards defendants $1,000 in attorney’s fees after considering plaintiff’s financial circumstances.


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 26 May 2010

Rich & Rich Partnership v. Poetman Records USA, Inc., et al.

Court holds that plaintiff's copyright registration of a derivative work is unenforceable because plaintiff did not adequately identify in the registration application the pre-existing work that the plaintiff's work was based on or incorporated.


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 14 Apr 2010

UMG Recordings, Inc. v. Veoh Networks Inc

District court denies Veoh Networks’ motion for attorney’s fees in DMCA safe harbor litigation, holding, inter alia, that Veoh failed to demonstrate that UMG acted in bad faith by failing to use DMCA’s notice and takedown procedure before filing suit and that UMG’s claims were not objectively unreasonable.


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 12 Aug 2009

Warren Publishing Co., et al. v. Spurlock

District court grants summary judgment holding that defendant’s reproduction of several graphic works, originally used as monster magazine covers by plaintiff, in a book retrospective of an artist’s career is a fair use based on finding that defendant’s use is transformative because the purpose of a retrospective of an artist’s work has a different purpose than magazine covers that are intended to sell copies of the magazine


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 8 Jul 2009

Arista Records LLC, et al v Usenet.com, Inc, et al

In copyright infringement action against file sharing service, court holds defendants directly infringed plaintiffs’ copyrights in their sound recordings and defendants are liable for vicarious and contributory infringement and inducement to infringe; court grants in part plaintiffs’ motion for sanctions for discovery abuse and prevents defendants from asserting DMCA safe harbor defense.

Previous page 1 Next page