We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Clear all

Refine your search

Content type


Firm name


206 results found


Winston & Strawn LLP | USA | 22 Aug 2016

Pirated Satellite TV not “Data” Within Meaning of Policy Exclusion

A Maryland federal district court recently ruled in favor of cable company Ellicott City Cable, which was seeking a defense from its media liability


Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP | USA | 2 Aug 2016

Insurer’s Broad Interpretation of Data Breach Exclusion Rejected by Court

Non-cyber insurance policies often contain exclusions to limit or preclude coverage for data breaches. A Maryland federal district court recently


Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP | USA | 29 Nov 2012

Court tackles copyright issue of "throwback" NFL uniforms in video games

Many video game creators go to great lengths to ensure that their games are highly realistic.


Loeb & Loeb LLP | USA | 16 Nov 2011

Bouchat v. Baltimore Ravens L.P

District court denies plaintiff’s request for an injunction preventing defendants, including the Baltimore Ravens football team, from using the team’s infringing “Flying B” logo which has since been replaced in highlight films and video clips, finding that plaintiff did not meet his burden of establishing the four factors supporting injunctive relief, and directing the parties to “make an effort to reach agreement” as to the reasonable compensation owing to plaintiff for the use of the infringing logo in the films at issue.


Winston & Strawn LLP | USA | 31 Oct 2011

Stored Communications Act and internet service providers

The most significant recent opinion on privacy and the reach of the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”) was issued in August, by Magistrate Judge Paul W. Grimm.


Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP | USA | 17 Feb 2011

$1 million in costs and fees assessed as sanction for spoliation

A federal magistrate judge in Maryland has determined that the plaintiffs in a case involving alleged patent and copyright violations incurred $1.05 million in reasonable costs and attorney’s fees for discovery “that would not have been undertaken but for Defendants’ spoliation, as well as the briefings and hearings regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions.”


McDermott Will & Emery | USA | 28 Oct 2010

Beware non-compliance with e-discovery

The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, in an 89-page opinion, has provided a detailed discussion of a litigant’s preservation duties and the standard a court should use in determining the sanctions resulting from the spoliation of evidence.


Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP | USA | 31 Jul 2009

Business liability policy’s intellectual property rights exclusion bars coverage for claims arising out of trademark violations

The United States District Court for the District of Maryland held in Marvin J. Perry, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Co., No. RWT-08-138 (D. Md. May 19, 2009), that a business liability policy’s intellectual property rights exclusion barred coverage for advertising injury caused by alleged trademark violations.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...