We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

Content type

Tags

21 results found

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 9 Apr 2019

Magistrate Judge Recommends Denial of Motion to Amend Final Infringement Contentions Where Plaintiff Should Have Sought Additional Information in Discovery

Plaintiff, Fox Factory, moved to amend its final infringement contentions, asserting that the defendant, SRAM, LLC, had failed to produce relevant

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 15 Dec 2016

District Court Strikes Infringement Contentions Pursuant to Doctrine of Equivalents Because They Contained Blanket Assertions That Did Not Comply with the Local Patent Rules

The Defendants filed a motion to strike the Plaintiff's infringement contentions, including their contentions under the doctrine of equivalents

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 23 May 2016

District Court Strikes Infringement Contentions and Sanctioned Plaintiff for Taking Inconsistent Positions

The defendant, Echoworx, brought a motion to strike ZixCorp's infringement contentions. ZixCorp had served its original infringement contentions on

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 29 Oct 2012

PB&J Software patent infringement claims dismissed with leave to amend for failure to identify a product

PB&J Software (PB&J) filed a patent infringement action against defendant Backup Agent.

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 2 Nov 2011

Defendants precluded from introducing evidence of their own scientists' work to apportion and decrease damages

In a patent infringement case pending before the United States District for the Western District of Wisconsin, the plaintiffs filed a motion in limine before the damages phase of the trial to preclude the defendants from arguing that the work performed by their scientists should be taken into account in apportioning damages.

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 19 Oct 2011

The battle over android continues: Google succeeds in striking part of Oracle's expert report

In August 2011, Google filed a motion to strike portions of the opening and reply expert reports of Oracle's expert on patent infringement.

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 19 Oct 2011

Failure to offer evidence of acceptable non-infringing alternatives in summary judgment precludes later offer at trial

Plaintiff filed a patent infringement action and subsequently filed a partial motion for summary judgment.

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 12 Oct 2011

Inducing infringement claims dismissed where plaintiff failed to allege intentional inducement

Plaintiff sued defendant for patent infringement for direct and indirect infringement for the commercial sale andor use of the defendant's asset tracking solutions product.

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 27 Sep 2011

Is "the 25 percent rule" still alive after Uniloc?

Parties and courts had come to rely on the so-called "25 percent rule" as a way of calculating a reasonably royalty rate in patent infringement cases.

Article

Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP | USA | 21 Sep 2011

Direct and indirect infringement contentions survive motion to dismiss where defendants' customers are identified as direct infringers

Plaintiff filed a patent infringement action based on patents for wireless communications networks and a system and method for monitoring and controlling remote devices.

Previous page 1 2 3