We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Firm name
Author
Jurisdiction

527 results found

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 7 Dec 2018

Friday Enforcement Wrap: Medical Device Manufacturer and Parent Company Pay $30.9 Million to Resolve FCA Claims

DOJ News Medical Device Manufacturer and Parent Company Pay $30.9 Million to Resolve FCA Claims Medical device manufacturer ev3 will plead guilty to

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 15 Aug 2018

Corporate income and franchise taxes in California

A structured guide to Corporate income and franchise taxes in California

Article

Arent Fox LLP | USA | 13 Sep 2016

Needing to Adjust: DOJ and HHS Announce Steep Increases to FCA, Stark Law, Anti-Kickback Statute, and EMTALA Penalties

Life science companies, health care providers, and government contractors will be at risk for significantly larger penalties due to substantial

Article

Baker McKenzie | USA | 12 Jul 2016

US Department of Justice doubles FCA’s per-violation civil penalties

On June 30, 2016, the Department of Justice announced that it will double the per-violation civil penalties assessed under the False Claims Act

Article

Sedgwick LLP | USA | 30 Sep 2011

Update on constitutional challenges to individual coverage mandate under the federal health care reform law

Two federal Courts of Appeals had reached opposite conclusions in constitutional challenges to the individual coverage mandate effective in 2014 under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).

Article

McMillan LLP | Canada | 20 Jul 2011

Knockout blow to knockoffs

In Louis Vuitton and Burberry v Singga Enterprises, the Federal Court has delivered a stern warning to those engaging in counterfeiting luxury goods in Canada by awarding an aggregate of $1.98 million in damages for trade-mark and copyright infringement and a further $0.5 million in punitive damages.

Article

Lane Powell PC | USA | 16 Jun 2011

Halliburton: US Supreme Court resolves circuit split on loss causation

In Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co. (No. 09-1403), the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals and held that a securities fraud plaintiff need not establish “loss causation,” i.e., that the defendant’s alleged misrepresentation caused the plaintiff an economic loss, in order to obtain class certification.

Article

Winston & Strawn LLP | USA | 13 Jun 2011

Supreme Court rules against Halliburton in securities fraud lawsuit

On June 6th, the Supreme Court unanimously ruled that private securities fraud plaintiffs do not need to prove loss causation in order to obtain class certification.

Article

McGuireWoods LLP | USA | 8 Jun 2011

After initial setback, Supreme Court holds that plaintiffs in Halliburton fraud action may obtain class certification

On June 6, 2011, the U.S Supreme Court held in Erica P. John Fund, Inc. v. Halliburton Co., 563 U.S. ____ (2011) that plaintiffs accusing Halliburton Co. of securities laws violations do not have to prove loss causation in order to obtain class certification.

Article

Pepper Hamilton LLP | USA | 7 Mar 2011

U.S. Supreme Court puts an end to Leegin redux

On February 22, 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to further refine or reconsider its 2007 decision in Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. v. PSKS, Inc. (Leegin I), when it denied PSKS’ latest certiorari petition.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...