We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-8 of 8

Supreme Court trilogy may not be class action trifecta for employers: an examination of Wal-Mart, Concepcion, and Amara
  • Epstein Becker Green
  • USA
  • August 9 2011

In the closing months of its 2010 session, the U.S. Supreme Court issued three highly publicized opinions affecting employment class actions: Wal-Mart Stores Inc. v. Dukes, 131 S. Ct. 2541 (2011) (118 DLR AA-1, 62011); AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion 131 S. Ct. 1740 (2011) (81 DLR AA-1, 42711); and Cigna Corp. v. Amara, 131 S. Ct. 1866 (2011) (94 DLR AA-1, 51611



John Houston Pope
  • Epstein Becker Green

Michael S. Kun
  • Epstein Becker Green

Frank C. Morris, Jr.
  • Epstein Becker Green

Allen B. Roberts
  • Epstein Becker Green

David W. Garland
  • Epstein Becker Green