We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 6,319

Federal Contracts and the Governing Provisions not always Provided for in the Contract
  • Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP
  • USA
  • June 19 2018

Contractors performing on federally funded projects should be aware of mandatory regulations governing the project. Under the Christian Doctrine, a


Who’s Kidding Who?
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • June 18 2018

A Feature Article of Law360 entitled “Ex-PTAB Judges Say Board Policies Don’t Squelch Dissents,” by Ryan Davis, argued that policies of the Patent


PTAB Failed to Properly Apply Test for Printed Publication
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • June 18 2018

The Federal Circuit vacated and remanded the PTAB’s decision that a video demonstration and slides distributed by Petitioner Medtronic at three


Non-Patent Literature at the PTAB
  • Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC
  • USA
  • June 12 2018

Typically, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) is thought to disfavor non-patent literaturethat is, “printed publications” under 35 U.S.C


PTAB Provides Guidance on Motion to Amend Practice
  • Buchanan Ingersoll & Rooney PC
  • USA
  • June 12 2018

In Western Digital Corp v. SPEX Tech, the PTAB provides guidance on motion to amend practice in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings at the Patent


Another Lesson in Timing for Disclaimers in CBM Reviews
  • Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC
  • USA
  • June 11 2018

The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“the Board”) recently held that Customedia Technologies, LLC (“Customedia”) could not moot the CBM proceeding with


Chief Judge Guidance: SAS Impact, Motions to Amend, and Claim Construction
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • June 8 2018

On June 5, 2018, Chief Judge David Ruschke and Vice Chief Judge Tim Fink of the Patent Trial and Appeals Board (PTAB) participated in a webinar


District Courts in the Seventh Circuit Begin to Clarify Landmark Severson Decision
  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • USA
  • June 7 2018

As we have previously reported, on September 20, 2017, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit issued a significant ruling for employers in


Indefiniteness Standard Applicable in PGRs: Reasonably Certain or Clear?
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • June 7 2018

Whether a claim is indefinite under 35 U.S.C. 112 is analyzed under different standards by District Courts and the PTAB. District Courts apply the


Uncertainty of IPR Estoppel in District Courts Continues
  • Baker Botts LLP
  • USA
  • June 5 2018

One of the early-recognized pitfalls of inter partes review (IPR) proceedings was the statutory estoppel of 35 U.S.C. 315(e)(2) barring petitioners