We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Author

4 results found

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 4 Aug 2011

Federal Circuit holds that "isolated DNA molecules" are patentable subject matter and method claims merely "comparing" or "analyzing" are not

The Federal Circuit issued its much-anticipated decision in The Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent and Trademark Office on July 29, 2011.

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 1 Apr 2010

District court holds gene sequences not patentable subject matter

On March 29, 2010, in the highly publicized and closely watched case of Association for Molecular Pathology, et al v. U. S. Patent and Trademark Office, et al. (real parties in interest patent holders Myriad Genetics and the University of Utah Research Foundation), the District Court in the Southern District of New York granted summary judgment in favor of Plaintiffs and held that 15 claims in Myriad’s 7 patents relating to human BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes (Breast Cancer Susceptibility genes 1 and 2) (collectively “BRCA12”) are invalid because they claim non-patentable subject matter.

Previous page 1 Next page