Clear all

Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Firm name
Author
Jurisdiction
Language

293 results found

Article
Ask Lexy

Winston & Strawn LLP | USA | 20 Dec 2018

Roche Molecular Systems, Inc. v. Cepheid, No. 2017-1690 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 9, 2018)

The Federal Circuit affirmed the Northern District of California’s summary judgment finding that patent claims related to detecting Mycobacterium…
Article
Ask Lexy

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP | USA | 29 Oct 2018

Rules for Patenting Genetic Biomarkers Are Updated in Roche v. Cepeid

As the readers of this blog are no doubt aware, patenting DNA defined only by a naturally occurring nucleotide sequence was banned by the U.S. Supreme…
Article
Ask Lexy

Banner Witcoff | USA | 31 May 2018

Can Challengers Now Attack Subject Matter Eligibility in Inter Partes Reviews?

The statute authorizing inter partes reviews (IPR) explicitly limits the grounds for cancellation to Sections 102 and 103 of the patent statute:…
Article
Ask Lexy

Knobbe Martens | USA | 4 Apr 2018

23andMe Wins FDA Approval for Test to Detect BRCA Mutations

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently authorized 23andMe to market its Personal Genome Service Genetic Health Risk Report for…
Commentary
Ask Lexy

KISCH IP | South Africa | 6 Feb 2017

Patenting DNA: discovery or invention?

Scientists and patent lawyers have long disagreed over whether DNA is a patentable invention or a mere discovery. The Patents Act states that a patent shall not be granted "for any variety of animal or plant or any essentially biological process for the production of animals or plants, not being a micro-biological process or the product of such a process". However, there is no significant......
Article
Ask Lexy

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP | Canada | 27 Oct 2016

Breveter le vivant : une question qui « gène »

Si la Cour suprême du Canada (CSC) a déjà commenté l’épineuse question de savoir si les gènes peuvent être brevetés, aucun tribunal canadien n’a…
Article
Ask Lexy

DLA Piper | Australia | 29 Jul 2016

Australian Patent Office resolves a Myriad of uncertainties

In D'Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc [2015] HCA 35 (D'Arcy v Myriad), the High Court of Australia unanimously held that the impugned claims of Myriad's…
Article
Ask Lexy

DLA Piper | USA | 26 Jul 2016

FDA’s new Next Generation Sequencing Draft Guidance leaves fundamental questions unanswered: key points

The Food and Drug Administration has released a 25-page Draft Guidance document addressing FDA oversight of certain applications of Next Generation…
Article
Ask Lexy

Foley & Lardner LLP | USA | 7 Jul 2016

CAFC Finds Cryopreservation Method Patent Eligible

The Federal Circuit ruled that the cryopreservation methods at issue in Rapid Litigation Mgmt. Ltd. v. CellzDirect Inc., are patent eligible under 35…
Article
Ask Lexy

Foley & Lardner LLP | USA | 11 Apr 2016

Methods Exploiting Junk DNA May Be Useful But Lack Patent Eligibility

Striking another blow against patent eligibility in the field of biotechnology, the Federal Circuit agreed with the district court that methods that…
Previous page 1 2 3 ...