We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type

9 results found


Epstein Becker Green | USA | 7 Nov 2011

"Take-home" toxic tort exposure claims

The concepts of “duty” and “foreseeability” figure prominently in any discussion of “take-home” toxic tort exposure claims.


Epstein Becker Green | USA | 13 Oct 2011

Companies must retain counsel to answer garnishments in Georgia

On September 12, 2011, the Supreme Court of Georgia approved UPL Advisory Opinion No. 2010-1 ("Advisory Opinion"), which was issued by the State Bar of Georgia's Standing Committee on the Unlicensed Practice of Law ("Standing Committee").


Epstein Becker Green | USA | 14 Oct 2009

Georgia legislature proposes dramatic changes to restrictive covenant laws

If eventually passed, proposed Georgia House Bill 173 will dramatically alter Georgia restrictive covenant law as we now know it.


Epstein Becker Green | USA | 31 Aug 2009

Georgia Supreme Court limits "in-term" restrictive covenants

In Atlanta Bread Company International, Inc., v. Lupton-Smith, 285 Ga. 587 (Ga. 2009), the Georgia Supreme Court held that covenants restricting a franchisee’s business activities during the life of the franchise agreement (“in-term” restrictive covenants) are unenforceable if not reasonably limited in time, territorial region, and scope.

Previous page 1 Next page