We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 63

Impact of OEM use on non-use cancellation actions in China
  • Barker Brettell LLP
  • China
  • July 11 2018

Earlier this year we reported here on the PRETUL case, which confirmed that original equipment manufacturing (OEM) use of a trade mark on goods made


Federal Court finds Bohemia and Bohemia Crystal marks should be cancelled for descriptiveness
  • Wrays
  • USA, Australia
  • March 7 2018

The Federal Court of Australia has found that the marks BOHEMIA and BOHEMIA CRYSTAL are liable to be removed from the Register of Trade Marks. Those


The Supreme Court Ponders the Constitutionality of Administrative Cancellation of Patents, But Probably Not for Long
  • Faruki Ireland Cox Rhinehart & Dusing PLL
  • USA
  • January 11 2018

In Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. Greene’s Energy Group, LLC, Docket No. 16-712, 137 S. Ct. 2239 (June 12, 2017), the Supreme Court will rule on


NYSDOL Proposes Regulations Enhancing an Employee’s Entitlement to Call-In Pay
  • Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
  • USA
  • January 10 2018

The New York State Department of Labor (the "NYSDOL") has proposed regulations revising the "call-in" pay requirements of the Minimum Wage Order for


Mozambique: beware of trade mark registration cancellations due to overdue declarations
  • ENSafrica
  • Mozambique
  • September 22 2017

Owners of trade marks in Mozambique should take heed of recent developments in IP rights in the country. While the code governing IP rights in


Mandatory Cardiac Episode Payment Program: CMS Proposes Cancellation
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • August 28 2017

On August 15, 2017, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule (Proposed Rule) that, if finalized, would (1) reduce


Separate Article III Standing Not Necessary for PTAB Appellees
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • August 8 2017

Last week, I analyzed the government's arguments supporting Article III standing for intervenors in Knowles Electronics v. Matal. In that case, the


Separate Article III Standing Not Necessary for PTAB Appellees
  • Oblon
  • USA
  • August 8 2017

Last week, I analyzed the government's arguments supporting Article III standing for intervenors in Knowles Electronics v. Matal. In that case, the


Chinese Trademark Offices Cut Official Fees by Half
  • Chofn Intellectual Property
  • China
  • March 30 2017

On March 30th, 2017, the Chinese Trademark Office announced its cut of the official fees by half, effective as of April 1st, 2017. The new fees are


Rio2016: A Trademark Infringement?
  • Schoenherr
  • European Union
  • August 19 2016

Recent media coverage has reported that it will be prohibited for companies to use hashtags such as Rio2016, or to share official reports regarding