We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.


Refine your search

Content type
Firm name

257 results found


Clyde & Co LLP | United Kingdom | 31 May 2017

A lesson in how to avoid tribunal claims by employees who live and work outside the UK

International employers are no doubt aware that an employee who works outside the UK may have the right to bring a claim for unfair dismissal or


Kelley Drye & Warren LLP | USA | 26 Apr 2011

In breach of fiduciary duty case, defendants have burden to show their assumed misconduct caused no harm

Cadant was founded in 1998 to develop systems for home Internet access.


Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP | USA | 12 May 2009

San Antonio Fire & Police Pension Fund v. Amylin Pharms., Inc., et. al.

In this case, the Court of Chancery interpreted so-called “poison put” provisions in an indenture, holding that for purposes of the indenture’s continuing director provision, a corporate board of directors was permitted to “approve” as continuing directors persons nominated by dissident stockholders (so as to prevent triggering a default under the indenture), even though the board was at the same time opposing the election of the dissident slates in its communications with stockholders.


Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | USA | 28 Feb 2009

New Jersey’s minority oppression statute can apply to foreign corporations

Two courts recently held that a New Jersey statute protecting minority shareholders in closely held corporations can be applied to foreign corporations that are sued in New Jersey.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...