We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Firm name
Author
Jurisdiction

134 results found

Article

Seyfarth Shaw LLP | USA | 12 Nov 2011

Because Arizona's "fundamental policy" regarding non-compete clauses is so different from that of the state of Washington, Arizona Federal Court refuses to enforce clause's provision calling for applicability of Washington state law

Courts around the country are split as to the circumstances under which the parties’ choice of law set forth in a non-compete agreement will be honored.

Article

Seyfarth Shaw LLP | USA | 6 May 2011

"Under pressure" not enough to make agreement unenforceable.

Plaintiff CLP Resources, Inc. (“CLP”), a large provider of temporary construction workers, sued a former employee, defendant Salerno, and his new business, Defendant Alliance Project Staffing (“Alliance”), claiming causes of action for breach of contract, misappropriation of trade secrets and tortious interference with existing and prospective contracts.

Article

Dorsey & Whitney LLP | USA | 27 Oct 2010

Non-competes and choice of law provisions

Our company's headquarters is located in Seattle, Washington.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...