We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 3,466

Brakes on Uber Appeal to Supreme Court following Confirmation of Worker Status
  • William Fry
  • United Kingdom
  • December 7 2017

In 2016, the UK Employment Tribunal (ET) declared that Uber drivers were ‘workers’ and therefore entitled to certain employment rights under UK law


The gig economy and worker status developments
  • DAC Beachcroft
  • United Kingdom
  • December 6 2017

An Employment Tribunal decided last year that Uber drivers were workers, benefiting from workers' rights, including the right to National Minimum Wage


Reimbursement of Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeal Tribunal fees: refund scheme now rolled out in full
  • DAC Beachcroft
  • United Kingdom
  • December 6 2017

In October the Government launched the initial phase of its tribunal fees refund scheme. It has now rolled out the scheme in full, and anyone eligible


Wrongful constructive dismissal: don't give misleading reasons for dismissal
  • DAC Beachcroft
  • United Kingdom
  • December 6 2017

Mr Rawlinson was employed as Brightside Group's new Group Legal Counsel. Concerns about his capability were identified very early on but


Employment status update: Uber drivers are still "workers" but...
  • Macfarlanes LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 4 2017

The Employment Appeal Tribunal has upheld a decision that a test group of Uber drivers are not genuinely "self-employed" but have the status of


TUPE: semi-manual method replaced with electronic method - was the activity fundamentally the same?
  • Hill Dickinson LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 4 2017

A service provision change transfer occurs where there is an organised grouping of employees whose principal purpose is to carry out activities on


EAT finds you cannot cherry pick from without prejudice conversations
  • Dentons
  • United Kingdom
  • December 1 2017

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), in the recent case of Graham v. Agilitas IT Solutions Ltd. (Agilitas), ruled that an employer cannot rely on


Where a decision-maker's decision is strongly influenced by someone acting with discriminatory motives, the decision may be viewed as a joint decision and may be discriminatory
  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 1 2017

In Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Denby the EAT upheld a Tribunal's decision that individuals who had heavily influenced the decisions of


Enforcement of paid annual leave
  • Birketts LLP
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • December 1 2017

In this important decision, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has decided that the enforcement of the right to paid holiday under the Working Time


Refusal to employ trade union member
  • Birketts LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • November 30 2017

The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held that the provisions protecting individuals from being refused employment due to their trade union