We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 12,381

UK: Court of Appeal reinstates burden of proof for discrimination claims
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 12 2017

The Court of Appeal has held that the EAT ruling in Efobi v Royal Mail Group (that it is not incumbent on the claimant in a discrimination claim to


Court Refuses To Release Correctional Facility Employer From Age Discrimination Suit, But Orders The EEOC To Identify Aggrieved Individuals
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • December 8 2017

In EEOC v. State of New Mexico, Dep’t of Corrections, No. 15-CV-879, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198770 (D.N.Mex. Dec. 4, 2017), the EEOC alleged that from


New Bill Would Outlaw Mandatory Arbitration Agreements For Sex Discrimination Disputes - Is A Poorly Constructed Bill The Right Cure For The Disease?
  • Baker & Hostetler LLP
  • USA
  • December 8 2017

Prior bills have attempted, unsuccessfully, to eliminate individual arbitration as a means to resolve employment disputes. Senator Al Franken


Claims of discrimination arising from professional disciplinary proceedings
  • RadcliffesLeBrasseur
  • United Kingdom
  • December 7 2017

Hot on the heels of Michalak v GMC, the Supreme Court dealt with another case which arose in the context of a discrimination claim brought against


U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument in Key Case on LGBT Rights and Religious Liberty
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • December 7 2017

On December 5, 2017, the United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Masterpiece Cakeshop, Ltd. V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission, No


Ouch: EEOC Gets Summary Judgment Win Relative To Employer’s Medical Testing
  • Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  • USA
  • December 7 2017

In EEOC v. Amsted Rail Co., No. 3:14-CV-1292, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189713 (S.D. Ill. Nov. 16, 2017), Amsted made conditional job offers to


No return to work in the foreseeable future: an undue hardship for employers
  • Lavery de Billy LLP
  • Canada
  • December 7 2017

Download this publication in PDF document Reversing a decision of the Tribunal administratif du travail (“TAT”), the Superior Court of Québec


Supreme Court Argument: Baker’s First Amendment Rights vs. Colorado’s Anti-Discrimination Law
  • Jackson Lewis PC
  • USA
  • December 6 2017

The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument in a case with potentially far-reaching implications for issues at the intersection of civil


Cake, Art and Free Speech or Discrimination?
  • Harris Beach PLLC
  • USA
  • December 6 2017

The United States Supreme Court is taking up a case about a cake that concerns non-discrimination laws and religious objections. Colorado, like many


Where a decision-maker's decision is strongly influenced by someone acting with discriminatory motives, the decision may be viewed as a joint decision and may be discriminatory
  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • December 1 2017

In Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis v Denby the EAT upheld a Tribunal's decision that individuals who had heavily influenced the decisions of