Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Firm name
Author
Jurisdiction
Language

338 results found

Article
Ask Lexy

Payne & Fears LLP | USA | 30 Apr 2019

Key California Employment Law Cases: February 2019

This month’s key California employment law cases involve reporting time pay and potential liability of payroll companies for wage and hour violations…
Article
Ask Lexy

McGuireWoods LLP | USA | 8 Apr 2019

Calif. Employees Can Dial for Dollars Under Employers’ On-Call Scheduling Policies

On Feb. 4, 2019, the California Court of Appeal decided Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc., holding that employers must provide “reporting time pay” when…
Article
Ask Lexy

Jackson Lewis PC | USA | 25 Jan 2019

Independent Contractor Test the Subject of Two California Assembly Bills

In 2018, the California Supreme Court issued an opinion (Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County) establishing a new…
Article
Ask Lexy

Atkinson Andelson Loya Ruud & Romo | USA | 12 Nov 2018

Safety First: California Legislation Provides Collective Bargaining Agreement Carve Out for Petroleum Facility Workers in Safety-Sensitive Positions for Rest Periods

With the passage of AB 2605 earlier this year, employees covered by specific Collective Bargaining Agreements ("CBAs") who hold a "safety-sensitive"…
Article
Ask Lexy

Jackson Lewis PC | USA | 5 Nov 2018

New California Law Creates Narrow Rest Break Exemption at Petroleum Facilities

On September 20, 2018, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law Assembly Bill 2605. This new law provides that unionized employees at petroleum…
Article
Ask Lexy

Payne & Fears LLP | USA | 20 Aug 2018

Key California Employment Law Cases: July 2018

This month’s key California employment law cases are from the California Supreme Court and from the California Court of Appeal. Troester v. Starbucks…
Article
Ask Lexy

Baker McKenzie | USA | 2 Aug 2018

California Supreme Court Leaves Open The Possibility Of A De Minimis Defense For Wage And Hour Claims - But Not Under The Facts Of This Case

Last week, in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation (Case No. S234969), the California Supreme Court weighed in for the first time on the viability of a…
Article
Ask Lexy

Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton LLP | USA | 1 Aug 2018

California Supreme Court: the FLSA’s de minimus rule does not apply to California wage and hour claims, especially wage and hour class actions that are designed to aggregate small claims

It is a small world after all. Last week, the California Supreme Court decided that the de minimus rule, imported by the U.S. Supreme Court into the…
Article
Ask Lexy

Greenberg Traurig LLP | USA | 30 Jul 2018

California Supreme Court Holds California Statutes and Wage Orders do not Incorporate FLSA De Minimis Doctrine; Declines to Decide Whether De Minimis Principle May Ever Apply to Wage and Hour Claims

On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court issued a long-awaited decision in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation, in which it considered the…
Article
Ask Lexy

Squire Patton Boggs | USA | 29 Jul 2018

Minutes Count: California Supreme Court Rejects De Minimis Doctrine for Wage Claim

On July 26, 2018, the California Supreme Court ruled in Troester v. Starbucks Corporation that the federal de minimis doctrine does not apply to a…
Previous page 1 2 3 ...