We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results: 1-10 of 101

Michigan Court Dismisses Earnings Claims With Prejudice
  • Gray Plant Mooty
  • USA
  • November 7 2017

A federal court in Michigan recently dismissed fraud claims brought against a provider of cryotherapy chambers for failure to state a cause of action


Continued Split Over Coverage for Fraudulently-Induced Monetary Transfers
  • Jenner & Block LLP
  • USA
  • November 6 2017

A number of courts have considered the issue of whether fidelity and crime policies with "computer fraud" provisions provide coverage for events in


Time to Take Your Medicine: Fifth Circuit Decision Diagnoses Problems with Causation Arguments
  • Vinson & Elkins LLP
  • USA
  • October 10 2017

Last month, we covered United States ex rel. King v. Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. on the issue of the FCA’s public disclosure bar pre-Affordable Care


Illinois Federal Court Denies Motion to Dismiss Counterclaims Alleging Offshore Reinsurance Company Was Not Established
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • September 1 2017

A warranty services and financing company (Company) and a car dealership (Dealership) entered into a warranty claims servicing agreement


District Court Rules that Claims Without Specific Misrepresentations Fail to Meet Escobar’s Test But Can Proceed Based on Fraudulent Inducement
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • August 29 2017

In Escobar, the Supreme Court upheld implied certification claims "at least where two conditions are satisfied," namely specific misrepresentations


Latest District Court Decision Confirms Escobar Two-Part Implied Certification Test
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • August 24 2017

One of the most litigated issues following the Supreme Court's Escobar decision is whether the Court created a limited, two-part test to define the


Implied False Certification Theory Fails in FCA Case Against Billing Agent
  • Mintz Levin Cohn Ferris Glovsky and Popeo PC
  • USA
  • August 23 2017

A court in the Southern District of New York (“SDNY” or the “Court”) recently released an important decision applying the Supreme Court’s landmark


Made in China: Ninth Circuit Departs from Escobar and Rules Government’s Continued Payment of Claims Despite Knowledge of Chinese Origin of Drugs Not Enough to Defeat Materiality on the Pleadings
  • Vinson & Elkins LLP
  • USA
  • July 18 2017

Since Escobar, FCA defendants have aggressively litigated materiality. They have asked courts to define when materiality can be defeated by a showing


Applying Escobar, Court Rejects Comparative Effectiveness and “Fraud on the Formulary” Claims
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • July 6 2017

The heightened materiality standard imposed by the Supreme Court last year in Escobar continues to pose a formidable bar to relators pursuing


When Do Disclaimer Clauses Bar Fraud Claims?
  • Dean Mead Attorneys at Law
  • USA
  • February 14 2017

The Plaintiff was an investor from the UK who had invested in Bobby Ginn developments previously. In the 2004-06 time frame, he bought two lots in