We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

Content type

Tags

Author

134 results found

Article

Osler Hoskin & Harcourt LLP | USA, United Kingdom, Canada | 12 Jul 2017

Legislative Update Report No. 2017-13

Regulations Amending the General Preferential Tariff and Least Developed Country Tariff Rules of Origin Regulations...

Article

DLA Piper | Canada | 30 Jan 2017

Clear contractual language prevails in court decision on incentive payout upon termination

The recent Alberta Court of Appeal decision Styles v Alberta Investment Management Corporation has highlighted the inherent right of an employer to

Article

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP | Canada | 7 Jul 2016

Update: Stewart Estate v TAQA North Ltd, the finale

In November 2015, the Alberta Court of Appeal issued its decision in Stewart Estate v TAQA North Ltd, 2015 ABCA 357, which addressed a number of

Article

Field Law | Canada | 21 Feb 2013

Privilege re documents provided to a certified medical examiner under the Minor Injury Regulation

In an automobile personal injury case, the defendant exercised its rights to nominate a certified examiner under the Minor Injury Regulation, Alta

Article

Field Law | Canada | 21 Feb 2013

Mandatory ADRJDR Rule 4.16

Both sides of this litigation presented the Court with a Consent Order in morning chambers for an order waiving the mandatory dispute resolution

Article

McCarthy Tétrault LLP | Canada | 28 Oct 2011

Issues of privilege: Scott & Associates Engineering Ltd. v. Ghost Pine Windfarm, LP

The decision of the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench in Scott & Associates Engineering Ltd. v. Ghost Pine Windfarm, LP addressed a variety of issues respecting the assertion of privilege by the respondents, Ghost Pine Windfarm, LP and Fortuna GP Inc. (collectively, Ghost Pine), over redacted portions of otherwise producible documents and, in particular, the redacted portions of an Asset Purchase Agreement (APA).

Article

Harper Grey LLP | Canada | 16 Jun 2011

RBC General Insurance Co. v. Kelly

Subrogated action for damages caused to the insured’s vehicle was dismissed on the basis that the defendant had implied consent to use the vehicle and, as a result, was an un-named insured.

Article

McCarthy Tétrault LLP | Canada | 12 Jan 2011

New Alberta Rules of Court: a client’s perspective

On November 1, 2010, the new Alberta Rules of Court are scheduled to come into force, repealing the current Rules of Court.

Article

Dentons | Canada | 17 Nov 2010

Alberta’s mandatory ADR requirement

On November 1, 2010, Alberta will see new Rules of Court (the "Rules") come into force.

Article

Fasken | Canada | 19 Oct 2010

The rules are coming! The rules are coming! A summary of the new Alberta Rules of Court (in force November 1, 2010)

The alarm bells are sounding with the official legislative approval and printing of the new Alberta Rules of Court in the August 14, 2010 edition of the Alberta Gazette.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...