We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Clear all

Refine your search

Content type

Tags

Author

86 results found

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 30 Oct 2018

Annual California Legislative Recap

Another year has passed in the California Legislature, with new laws and amendments affecting California employers. Among the more significant changes

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 31 Aug 2016

Four Pitfalls to Avoid When Seeking to Terminate a Section 337 Investigation by Consent Order

A survey of recent decisions at the International Trade Commission (ITC) reveals a series of pitfalls practitioners should seek to avoid when drafting

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 1 Jul 2014

More good news for class action waivers in arbitration agreements: California Supreme Court upholds class action waiver in employment dispute, except for representative PAGA claims

On June 23, the California Supreme Court issued its first opinion upholding a class action waiver following the U.S. Supreme Court's seminal decision

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 25 Jun 2014

California Supreme Court upholds class action waivers in arbitration agreements, but invalidates waivers of representative actions under the California Private Attorneys General Act

On June 23, the California Supreme Court provided mixed blessings to California employers. In Iskanian v. CLS Transportation, No. S204032 (June 23

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 28 Apr 2014

FINRA Board of Governors invalidates class action waivers in customer account agreements

In an April 24th ruling that will have widespread impact among financial institutions, the FINRA Board of Governors held that a broker-dealer

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 3 Sep 2013

Supreme Court reaffirms commitment to enforcing arbitration agreements

The Supreme Court decision in American Express Co v Italian Colors Restaurant builds on a recent line of pro-arbitration rulings and reaffirms the court's commitment to enforcing arbitration agreements.

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 24 Jun 2013

American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant: the Supreme Court reaffirms its commitment to enforcing arbitration agreements

Last week's Supreme Court decision in American Express Co. v. Italian Colors Restaurant builds on a recent line of pro-arbitration rulings -

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 25 Feb 2013

GAO dismisses protest based on a post-hoc waiver of OCIs

The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently opened the door for government agencies to use their waiver authority under the Federal

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 15 Jan 2013

Delaware court provides further guidance on enforceability of “don’t ask, don’t waive” standstills

On November 27, 2012, a bench ruling by Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of the Delaware Court of Chancery in In re Complete Genomics, Inc

Article

Morrison & Foerster LLP | USA | 18 Dec 2012

Federal court decision supports use of “big-boy letters”

“Big-Boy Letters” are often used as a tool to limit an issuer’s or broker-dealer’s potential liability in connection with a private sale of securities.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...