We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search

Refine your search

Content type

Tags

Firm name

Author

117 results found

Article

Manatt Phelps & Phillips LLP | USA | 17 Feb 2017

CFPB Fines Real Estate Entities Over RESPA Violations

Targeting violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) by a mortgage lender, two real estate brokers, and a mortgage servicer, the

Article

Baker & Hostetler LLP | USA | 13 Feb 2012

District Court for the Northern District of Ohio denies certification in two consumer lending cases

The District Court for the Northern District of Ohio recently denied certification in two related class actions brought under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA"), Toldy v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co. et al. (No. 1:09-CV-377) and Powers v. Fifth Third Mortgage Co. et al. (No. 1:09-CV-2059).

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 6 Jul 2011

NYC condo refinance collapses because there was no "meeting of the minds"

In Trief v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Index No. 10528009, N.Y.S.2d (Sup Ct, NY County, Apr. 4, 2011) (“Trief”), the plaintiffs sought damages arising out of their attempt to refinance a mortgage loan with the defendant bank (the “Bank”), for breach of contract and violation of New York’s Unfair and Deceptive Practices Act, N.Y. General Business Law (“NYGBL”) 349.

Article

Foley & Lardner LLP | USA | 12 Aug 2010

Third Circuit reverses dismissal of RESPA 8(b) markup claim

In Tubbs v. North American Title Agency, Inc., No. 09-2757, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16342, 2010 WL 3044067 (3d Cir. Aug. 5, 2010), the Third Circuit held that a lower court erred in dismissing a RESPA Section 8(b) claim.

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 6 Apr 2010

Ninth Circuit rules that the National Bank Act preempts California's unfair competition law

On March 9, 2010, the Ninth Circuit held that the National Bank Act ("NBA") preempts claims of "unfair" and "fraudulent" conduct in violation of state law.

Article

Ballard Spahr LLP | USA | 12 Mar 2010

Ninth Circuit: National Bank Act preempts state UDAP claims for mark-ups and overcharges; no RESPA Section 8(b) claim for overcharges

A decision this week by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit bolsters the position of national banks that the National Bank Act (NBA) and regulations of the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) trump state laws on fee-related practices.

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 11 Mar 2010

Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals joins other circuits and holds that overcharge does not violate Section 8(b) of RESPA

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which includes California, issued a ruling on March 9 that the clear and unambiguous language of RESPA Section 8(b) does not reach the practice of overcharging.

Article

Foley & Lardner LLP | USA | 10 Mar 2010

Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of RESPA claim for overcharges

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a purported class action under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act ("RESPA") because the plain language of RESPA does not apply to the practice of "overcharging," as well as the dismissal of three state law claims that are preempted under the National Bank Act.

Article

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP | USA | 22 Dec 2009

Fifth Circuit denies class certification of kickback claims under RESPA

In Mims v. Stewart Title Guaranty Co., 2009 WL 4642631 (5th Cir. Dec. 9, 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit considered whether plaintiffs can bring class claims under Section 8(b) of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (“RESPA”), codified in relevant part at 12 U.S.C. 2607(c), where a service provider’s fee “bears no relationship” to the service provided.

Previous page 1 2 3 ...