On July 25, 2016 ALJ David P. Shaw issued Order No. 6 in Certain Personal Transporters, Components Thereof, and Packaging and Manuals Therefor (Inv
Yesterday, the Patent Trial & Appeal Board (PTAB) announced the designation of five, additional precedential decisions. Garmin Int’l v. Cuozzo Speed
On October 29, 2013, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 19 in Certain Cases For Portable Electronic Devices (Inv. No. 337-TA-861867). By way of
On December 14, 2012, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 26 in Certain Electronic Devices with Communication Capabilities, Components Thereof, and Related Software (Inv. No. 337-TA-808).
On October 18, 2012, ALJ E. James Gildea issued the public version of Order No. 15 (dated September 20, 2012) granting Complainant Immersion Corporation’s motion to preclude Respondent Motorola Mobility, Inc’s expert from serving in the investigation and accessing Immersion’s confidential business information in Certain Mobile Electronic Devices Incorporating Haptics (Inv. No. 337-TA-834).
On January 30, 2012, ALJ David P. Shaw issued Order No. 33 concerning a renewed request to strike expert testimony by the Respondent in Certain Gaming and Entertainment Consoles, Related Software, and Components Thereof (337-TA-752).
One purpose for introducing evidence of an ongoing patent reexamination in a parallel litigation is to avoid a post filing (i.e., complaint) willfulness determination.
On December 7, 2011, Knowles Electronics LLC of Itasca, Illinois (“Knowles”) filed a complaint requesting that the ITC commence an investigation pursuant to Section 337.
The existence of a competitive relationship between the litigants is often times an important consideration to district court judges considering a stay pending patent reexamination.
On November 4, 2011, ALJ Thomas B. Pender issued Order No. 15: Granting Samsung LED Co., Ltd.’s Motion To Compel Domestic Industry From Complainant OSRAM in Certain Light-Emitting Diodes and Products Containing the Same (Inv. No. 337-TA-785).