We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 2,272

Rule Changes Will Advance a Famous Judge Rich Axiom
  • Marshall Gerstein & Borun LLP
  • USA
  • October 23 2018

For AIA trial petitions filed after November 12, 2018, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board will construe claims challenged and proposed to be amended

The Supreme Court’s Business Docket for the October 2018 Term
  • Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom LLP
  • USA
  • October 22 2018

On September 26, 2018, Skadden hosted a webinar titled “US Supreme Court October 2018 Term.” Topics included some of the key business-related cases on

Indefiniteness Again Leads To Unsuccessful IPR Challenge
  • Jones Day
  • USA
  • October 18 2018

The PTAB may institute IPR proceedings only on the basis of certain prior art that is potentially invalidating under 102 (novelty) or 103

Singing the Same Claim Construction Tune: USPTO Adopts Federal Court Claim Construction Standard for AIA Proceedings
  • Bracewell LLP
  • USA
  • October 18 2018

On October 11, 2018, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published notice of a final rule change adopting the claim construction

Federal Circuit PTAB Appeal Statistics - September 15, 2018
  • Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
  • USA
  • October 17 2018

Through September 15, 2018, the Federal Circuit decided 418 PTAB appeals from IPRs and CBMs. The Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB on every issue in

Changes to PTAB’s Claim Construction Standard
  • Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
  • USA
  • October 16 2018

On October 10, 2018, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) announced that it will issue a final rule changing the claim construction

USPTO Harmonizes New Claim Construction Standard in PTAB Proceedings
  • Latham & Watkins LLP
  • USA
  • October 15 2018

On October 10, 2018, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) published a final rule that replaces the current “broadest reasonable

When being natural can be misleading: recent consideration of organic product claims
  • Maddocks
  • Australia
  • October 15 2018

Recent decisions by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission and the Federal Court of Appeal have demonstrated that it can be a fine line

In IPR, a Patent Owner gets SASsy -- With a Bold New Interpretation that the Supreme Court SAS Case Makes for Bad in many IPRs
  • Banner & Witcoff Ltd
  • USA
  • October 15 2018

Inter partes reviews (IPRs) are canceling patent claims. The U.S. Supreme Court decided that IPRs are constitutional, in Oil States. Almost

Invalidity Contentions as IPR Estoppel Markers
  • Ropes & Gray LLP
  • USA
  • October 14 2018

Invalidity Contentions Serve as Estoppel Benchmark A Patent Owner may only avail itself of an IPR estoppel defense in court upon demonstrating that a