We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance



Results:1-10 of 177

House Republicans and Trump Administration Ask Court to Delay House's Lawsuit Challenging Affordable Care Act Cost-Sharing Reduction Payments
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • March 1 2017

On Feb. 21, the House of Representatives and the Trump administration filed a joint motion in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of


Injunction Enjoining Enforcement of HHS Attestation Rule Affirmed
  • Foley & Lardner LLP
  • USA
  • July 6 2016

The Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia affirmed the District Court’s decision in Central United Life v. Burwell on July 1, 2016. This


U.S. appeals courts issue conflicting decisions on whether ACA permits tax subsidies of health care coverage purchased through federal exchanges
  • McDermott Will & Emery
  • USA
  • July 24 2014

On July 22, 2014, three-judge panels of the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the District of Columbia and Fourth Circuits issued conflicting decisions


Halbig v Burwell: D.C. appeals court strikes Obamacare health insurance subsidies
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • July 23 2014

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit ruled, in a 2-to-1 decision, in Halbig v. Burwell that the IRS is not authorized under the Affordable


U.S. district court enjoins contraceptive coverage mandate applied to for-profit religious publishing company
  • Holland & Knight LLP
  • USA
  • November 19 2012

On November 16, 2102, in Tyndale House Publishers, Inc. v. Sebelius, No. 12-1635 (D. D.C. Nov. 16, 2012), the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia granted a preliminary injunction to a closely held, for-profit religious publishing company and its president and CEO against enforcement of Department of Health and Human Services regulations interpreting the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to require all health insurance plans and policies, unless grandfathered or otherwise exempt, to comply with the contraceptive coverage mandate starting with the plan years beginning on or after August 1, 2012.


D.C. Circuit follows Sixth Circuit in upholding the individual mandate under the health care statute
  • Squire Patton Boggs
  • USA
  • November 8 2011

A few hours ago, the D.C. Circuit upheld the constitutionality of the mandate requiring individuals to purchase health insurance under the recently enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Public Law 111-148.


PPACA individual mandate: 3 to 2 in favor of constitutionality
  • Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
  • USA
  • March 2 2011

On February 22, United States District Judge Gladys Kessler for the District of Columbia ruled in favor of the constitutionality of the “individual mandate” provision in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), and dismissed the lawsuit brought by individual plaintiffs for failure to state a claim (Mead v. Holder).