We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 508

Mars Turns up the Heat on Kraft’s Summer-Proof Chocolate
  • Macpherson Kelley
  • Australia
  • October 8 2018

If you thought inventing heat-resistant chocolate is patent-worthy, you would be wrong. Well, at least according to last week's Australian Patent

Kraft peanut butter, never oily or dry - and never imitated?
  • Phillips Ormonde Fitzpatrick
  • Australia
  • September 20 2018

Australian Federal Court not impressed with parallel AUUS proceedings Earlier this year, in a decision made by O’Callaghan J of the Federal Court

US: Authorized automobile dealerships drive discussion on patent venue in the Eastern District of Texas
  • Hogan Lovells
  • USA
  • September 17 2018

In May 2017, the Supreme Court tightened the rule for venue over domestic defendants in patent infringement cases finding that, under 28 U.S.C.

Patently unpredictable? Patent venue laws after TC Heartland & In re Cray
  • Kane Russell Coleman Logan PC
  • USA
  • September 12 2018

Venue for patent infringement cases is governed by 28 U.S.C. 1400(b), which states that patent infringement suits can be brought in the judicial

Depreciation of Rights in the Trademark “Express”
  • Marval O'Farrell & Mairal
  • Argentina
  • July 3 2018

On November 8, 2017, Division 2 of the Federal Court of Appeals on Civil and Commercial Matters upheld the first instance decision and declared the

New Jersey Court Holds That Taxpayer Not Entitled to Exception to State’s Interest Add-Back Requirement
  • Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
  • USA
  • June 12 2018

In Kraft Foods Global, Inc. v. Director, Division of Taxation, 2018 WL 2247356 (May 17, 2018), the New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

Australian international arbitration update
  • Holding Redlich
  • Australia, Global
  • May 10 2018

There have been two recent decisions of note. The first (Warner Brothers) involved a Californian arbitration agreement incorporated in “standard terms

Q1 Data Update: The New Year Brings Greater Clarity as the Pendulum Swings Back
  • RPX Corp
  • USA
  • April 3 2018

The end of 2017 left the patent ecosystem at a crossroads, with pending judicial rulings, new strategies by plaintiffs and defendants, market

3rd Circuit Articulates Direct Purchaser Standing Framework in Egg Product Lawsuit
  • McGuireWoods LLP
  • USA
  • March 16 2018

The 3rd Circuit revived a lawsuit filed by Kraft, General Mills, Kellogg and Nestle against several egg producers in an opinion issued on Jan. 22. In

DiscriminationRetaliation: Importance of Documentation
  • Breazeale Sachse & Wilson LLP
  • USA
  • March 11 2018

All employers and their leaders should recognize the importance of timely and well documented attention to employee performance concerns. Addressing