We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results: 1-10 of 183

Sidley Shale and Hydraulic Fracturing Report - 21 June, 2017
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • June 21 2017

The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) both took steps to extend

Sidley Shale and Hydraulic Fracturing Report - 6 December, 2016
  • Sidley Austin LLP
  • USA
  • December 6 2016

Army Corps decided against granting an easement to Dakota Access pipeline

USEPA finalizes guidance on mountain-top mining
  • Reed Smith LLP
  • USA
  • July 25 2011

Last year we discussed the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) interim guidance for permitting of mountain-top mining and surface mining projects and the likelihood of revisions based on comments USEPA would receive

US hydropower market
  • Chadbourne & Parke LLP
  • USA
  • May 26 2011

The following is an edited transcript from a webinar in mid-March hosted by Infocast about the US hydroelectric market

The battle against guidance continues
  • Foley Hoag LLP
  • USA
  • April 6 2011

I'm beginning to feel like a broken record, but the drumbeat of the anti-guidance crowd is not letting up

FERC addresses status of federal entities under reliability rules
  • Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
  • USA
  • December 20 2010

In an order issued on December 16, 2010, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) affirmed that federal entities are subject to the North American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) Reliability Standards

9th Circuit upholds Corps permit and biological opinion
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • June 22 2010

In Butte Environmental Council v United States Army Corps of Engineers, No 09-15363 (9th Cir June 1, 2010), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed that it is appropriate for the Corps to consider an applicant's project purpose, and that an area of a species' critical habitat can be destroyed without appreciably diminishing the value of the species' critical habitat overall

Corps and EPA issue important new mitigation rule
  • Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
  • USA
  • April 16 2008

On April 10, 2008, the Army Corps of Engineers ("Corps") and the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") issued a final rule governing mitigation requirements for unavoidable impacts to wetlands and other waters of the United States under the section 404 program of the Clean Water Act

Jay Holloway
  • Winston & Strawn LLP

John Fehrenbach
  • Winston & Strawn LLP