Refine your search

Content type
Firm name

3,436 results found


Torkin Manes LLP | Canada | 25 Nov 2019

When is a Structure Not A “Structure”? The Modern Approach to Statutory Interpretation

When Courts interpret statutes, they consider the "ordinary meaning" of the words used in the legislation. "Ordinary meaning" refers to the reader's


Pearl Cohen Zedek Latzer Baratz | USA | 15 Apr 2019

Federal Circuit Makes Ruling on Trademarking Websites Precedential

At the urging of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the Federal Circuit has made precedential its January ruling in In re: Siny Corp., case number


Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC | USA | 20 Mar 2019

First Precedential Opinion Panel Determines PTAB Has Discretion to Join Same Party and New Issues to Existing IPR

Last week, the first Precedential Opinion Panel (“POP”) entered a decision examining the scope of joinder available under 35 U.S.C. 315(c)


Crowell & Moring LLP | USA | 12 Mar 2019

New Reporting Pay Obligations for California Retailers - Blame the Cell Phone?

A recent decision by a California appellate court may increase the frustration level for retailers trying to implement effective flexible work


Jones Day | USA | 27 Feb 2019

Return Mail Argued Before the Supreme Court

On February 19, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Return Mail, Inc. v. United States Postal Service, No. 17-1594 (U.S.). This case raises an


White & Case LLP | USA | 13 Feb 2019

Illinois Supreme Court Rules: “Aggrieved” Person Does Not Require Separate, “Actual” Injury for Biometric Information Privacy Act Claim

On January 25, 2019, the Supreme Court of Illinois held in Rosenbach v. Six Flags Entertainment Corp. that an "aggrieved" person entitled to seek


Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP | USA | 13 Feb 2019

Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC

"When licensing trademark rights, you need to think about a host of issues at the outset including the impact of a licensor declaring bankruptcy."


Epstein Becker Green | USA | 5 Feb 2019

California Court of Appeal Concludes That Certain Types of On-Call Scheduling Triggers Requirement to Pay Wages

On February 4, 2019, a divided panel of the California Court of Appeal issued their majority and dissenting opinion in Ward v. Tilly’s, Inc. It


Blaney McMurtry LLP | USA, United Kingdom, Canada | 1 Feb 2019

Blaney’s appeals: Ontario Court of Appeal Summaries (January 28 - February 1, 2019)

In Presley v Van Dusen, the Court of Appeal yet again dealt with discoverability. The case reviews the elements for analyzing discoverability under


Herbert Smith Freehills LLP | Hong Kong | 25 Jan 2019

Must reasons be given for removing a director: Hong Kong High Court takes a closer look

In Kenneth Yeung Bing Kwong v Mount Oscar Ltd 2018 HKCFI 2763, the Court of First Instance (“Court“) held that a Hong Kong company is not required

Previous page 1 2 3 ...