Clear all

Refine your search

Content type
Tags
Firm name
Author
Jurisdiction
Language

281 results found

Article
Ask Lexy

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP | USA | 24 Mar 2017

Ninth Circuit Reverses Lower Court on Compulsory License Rights of OVDs

Broadcasters were handed a key legal victory Tuesday as a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reversed a lower court opinion…
Article
Ask Lexy

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP | USA | 29 Jul 2016

FilmOn X, Supporters Ask D.C. Circuit to Reverse Lower Court Decision on Compulsory License Rights

Filing briefs with the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, FilmOn X and its supporters asked the court to reverse a D.C. District Court decision to deny…
Article
Ask Lexy

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP | USA | 17 Jun 2016

Did Aereo Open The Door To Compulsory Licenses?

After the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in ABC v. Aereo Inc., 134 S.Ct. 2498 (2014), that Aereo's internet retransmission service was "substantially…
Article
Ask Lexy

Haynes and Boone LLP | USA | 28 Apr 2016

Section 111 Compulsory License for Internet Streaming Still Up in the Air

The fallout from the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. remains unsettled almost two years after…
Article
Ask Lexy

Dorsey & Whitney LLP | USA | 24 Nov 2015

Down Stream from Aereo: FilmOn Pulled by Different Legal Currents

Last year in American Broad. Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc., the Supreme Court dealt a significant victory to the broadcast industry when it concluded…
Article
Ask Lexy

Foster Swift Collins & Smith PC | USA | 24 Mar 2015

The final chapter on Aereo’s Chapter 11

On June 25, 2014, the United States Supreme Court ruled that cloud-based television-streaming service, Aereo, violated U.S. Copyright Law and its…
Article
Ask Lexy

King & Wood Mallesons | Australia | 10 Mar 2015

Aereo and Optus TV now – a comparison of the US Supreme Court and Australian Full Federal Court decisions

The Supreme Court of the United States in Aereo and the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Optus TV Now have both considered the…
Article
Ask Lexy

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP | USA | 23 Jan 2015

Court rules for DISH Network on copyright infringement claims

DISH Network was handed a partial legal victory in a Los Angeles federal court as U.S. District Court Judge Dolly M. Gee rejected claims that DISH…
Article
Ask Lexy

Knobbe Martens | USA | 22 Jan 2015

Supreme Court rules on “tacking” and district court distinguishes dish network from Aereo

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court held that whether two trademarks may be tacked for purposes of determining priority is a question for the jury…
Article
Ask Lexy

Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP | USA | 31 Dec 2014

Bankruptcy court approves auction of Aereo technology assets

Aereo, Inc. will be permitted to auction off its live television streaming technology to the highest bidder in accordance with a December 24 order…
Previous page 1 2 3 ...