We use cookies to customise content for your subscription and for analytics.
If you continue to browse Lexology, we will assume that you are happy to receive all our cookies. For further information please read our Cookie Policy.

Search results

Order by: most recent most popular relevance

Results:1-10 of 219

La Inner House della Court of Session scozzese interroga la Corte di Giustizia sulla possibilità di revocare unilateralmente la notifica di recesso del Regno Unito dall’Unione Europea
  • De Berti Jacchia Franchini Forlani Studio Legale
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • October 4 2018

In data 21 settembre 2018 la Inner House della Court of Session scozzese (corte d’appello scozzese) ha presentato una domanda di pronuncia

Over the finish line? Wrotham Park damages
  • Penningtons Manches LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • June 19 2018

In the week that the London Marathon took place, the Supreme Court handed down a marathon judgment. The case was Morris-Garner & Another v One Step

The letter of credit and the third party debt order
  • Addleshaw Goddard LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • March 20 2018

Supreme Court overturns 35 year old decision to help party enforce arbitration award Taurus Petroleum Limited v State Oil Marketing Company of the

Biotech Review - December 2017
  • Bristows
  • United Kingdom
  • December 13 2017

As biological drugs continue to replace small molecules as the sales leaders in the pharmaceutical field, they are increasingly taking the

Supreme Court “improves” upon the ImproverProtocol Questions in Actavis v Eli Lilly.
  • Bristows
  • United Kingdom, European Union
  • September 20 2017

In this important case from July of this year, the Supreme Court reintroduced a true form of the doctrine of equivalents into UK patent law, allowing

SAAMCo - where do we stand following Hughes-Holland v BPE?
  • Hardwicke
  • United Kingdom
  • May 26 2017

On 22nd March 2017, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Hughes-Holland v BPE Solicitors LLP 2017 UKSC 21. This was a highly-anticipated

Supreme Court reformulates test for when a claim will fail due to illegality
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 25 2016

The Supreme Court has established a new approach to the question of whether a defendant will be able to rely on the defence of illegality: Patel

Supreme Court finds tort of malicious prosecution extends to civil claims
  • Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
  • United Kingdom
  • July 21 2016

The Supreme Court has held, by a majority of 5 to 4, that the tort of malicious prosecution is available for civil as well as criminal claims: Willers

Kumarasamy v Edwards 2016 UKSC 40; judgment 13 July 2016
  • Tanfield Chambers
  • United Kingdom
  • July 13 2016

The case concerned an assured shorthold tenant of a flat, Mr Edwards, who tripped over a raised edge of a paving slab when taking his rubbish from

Tax advice given by accountants not protected by privilege
  • Bennett Jones LLP
  • Canada
  • January 24 2013

Legal advice privilege applies only to lawyers and does not extend to tax advice provided by accountants, the United Kingdom Supreme Court (formerly